
          In 1925 it was compared with Springdale
in general appearance including ribbing
mention made of pimply surface similar
to 20 oz.  In 1926 there was apparently
an absence of ribbing and pimply
dots not in evidence.

Apparently in 1927 conditions were
unfavorable for this variety since
it was noted as below medium in
size, flesh a little tough, quite sweet
but rather flat and "difficult to see
and place for it."  It was rather firm
on Aug. 17 when examined. Possibly
(probably even) it was then not fully
mature

No painting
No description

source.
Pom. No. 50536. scions received
4/13/11 of Connett Sweet? from
A. S. Otto, Osterburg, Pa.
The entry carries the
question mark after name.
        