325 
and Classification of the Pauropoda, with Notes . . . (Tufts College 
Studies, No. IV, 1895, p. 77—146, PI. I—IV); it is very valu- 
able as to the internal anatomy, and it contains a useful account 
of the external structure and morphology of the order, hut very 
little on the species. The author has only studied specimens of 
Eur. spinosus and of a species of Pauropus determined as P. Hux- 
leyi Lubb., but his fig. 42 (exhibiting the organs described by me 
as the anal plate and the styli) shows that his specimens belong to 
another spedies. For the rest I refer the reader to the paper it- 
self and will only set forth a few remarks. He has g’iven an er- 
roneous account of the terminal organs of the legs, he has not stu¬ 
died the anal segment, and his opinion, that the tactile setæ in 
Pauropus are inserted outside the terga, is not correct, as the 
setæ originate in this family from the terga. As already mentioned 
he suggests the foundation of the family Brachypauropodidce, but 
his new names Agilimota and Tardimota for the groups established 
by Latzel are quite superfluous, as these groups 'in reality ought 
to be suppressed, the Brachypauropodidce being more closely related, 
to the Pcturopodidæ than to the Eurypauropodidæ. 
The other papers published since Latzel’s work contain essen- 
tially or exclusively descriptions of species. E. TomOsvary (Ter- 
mész. fiizetek, VII, 1884, p. 39—40, with hg.), E. Daday (My- 
riopoda Eegni Hungariæ, Budapest 1889), F. Silvestri (Boli. d. 
Soc. Romana per gli Stud. Zool., III, 1894) and C. Graf v. At- 
tems (Die Myriopoden Steiermarks, in: Sitzber. d. Kais. Akad. d.. 
Wiss., Wien, Math. Naturw. Classe, CIV. B., I, 1895, p. 117—238, 
Taf. I—VII) have described in all three (or perhaps four) new 
species and a new genus of Eurypauropodidæ from Austria-Hun- 
gary and Italy. E. Haase (Schlesiens Symphylen und Pauropoden, 
Breslau, 1885, p. 1—15) and A. Berlese (Acari, Myriopoda et 
Scorpiones hucusque in Italia reperta, pt. NXI and XXIII) have 
redescribed the two species of Pauropus established by Lubbock. 
I have not seen the papers written by Tomosvary, Daday, Silvestri 
and Haase, but as far as I have been able to judge from extracts 
