©Y^@©[£^CML[yji tm™ 
Thoth Baboon. 
Cynocephalus Thoth , Ogilby, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1843, p. 11. 
The following of the species is given by Mr. Ogilby:— 
“ This Abyssinian species, which was reported to have been brought from Bombay, but which had no 
doubt been carried thither on board some vessel trading to the Red Sea, possesses a higher degree of interest 
than attaches to any other Cynocephal. With the exception of C. hamadryas , it is the only known species in 
that part of Africa, and must consequently have been the animal which we find so frequently figured among 
the hieroglyphics, and which was worshipped by the Egyptians under the name of Thoth. I have shown else¬ 
where (Nat. Hist, of Monkeys, &c., i. 431) that the Sacred Baboon of the Egyptians was not the C. hamadryas , 
as supposed by Ehrenberg; and though, from the mistake above alluded to, I was at that time inclined to 
identify it with C. anubis , there can now be no reasonable doubt that the animal which played so important a 
part in the mythology of that remarkable people, and of whose worship the city of Hermopolis was the principal 
seat, must have been the species at present under consideration. If this conjecture be well-founded, it follows 
also that the names cynocephalus , sphinx , &c., so often employed by Greek and Roman writers, must have 
referred to the same animal, at least originally; but as modern zoologists have applied all these names in a 
definite sense, I propose to distinguish the new species by the equally appropriate designation of u Thoth ” which 
it bore among the ancient Egyptians. 
“ The individual from which this description was taken is an old male of large size, and, like the rest of 
his congeners, of a morose intractable disposition. The face is broad and of a dirty livid flesh-colour, lighter 
along the centre and ridge of the nose, and somewhat browner on the cheeks and muzzle; the cheek-bones are 
protuberant, the rostrum truncated, and the extremity of the nose reaching, but not surpassing, the plane of the 
upper lip and teeth. The hair of the fore-quarters is longer and thicker than on the rest of the body, though 
it does not form so dense or copious a mane as in C. hamadryas. The colour of the upper and outer parts of 
the body may be described as dark olive-green, and that of the lower and interior as light yellowish green; 
the breast, throat and under part of the chin are silvery grey; the lower parts of the whiskers are of the same 
colour, but they acquire a yellowish green shade as they approach and become intermixed with the hair of the 
head; the ears and palms of the hands are naked, and of a dark brown colour; the callosities very large and 
flesh-coloured, and the naked parts of the hips on each side of the callosities of a deep purple or violet-brown; 
the sciotum is brown, and the sheath of the penis flesh-coloured. The tail is of medium length, without a 
terminal tuft, and carried in the arched manner common to the rest of the genus. The hind surfaces of the 
legs and thighs are furnished with long hair of a yellowish brown shade; the hands are of the same colour as 
the body, but the hind fingers are covered with longish grey hairs, and this character, together with the dark 
pin pie colour of the naked hips and brown scrotum, will always be sufficient to distinguish the present 
species from C. anubis and C. sphinx , in both of which the naked parts of the buttocks are of a brilliant blood- 
red, and. the scrotum pale flesh-colour. In colour indeed C. Thoth approaches more nearly to C. sphinx than to 
6 anubis; it has the same light silvery grey colour on the whiskers and under part of the body, but the upper 
co ours aie more obscure; the bright yellowish green is replaced by sordid dunnish brown, and the proportions 
of the two animals are entirely different, the long slender limbs and body of the sphinx contrasting strongly 
with the massive thick-set form of the present species.” 
