282 
[Oct 1, 
% 
Incidents in and near London. 
DIVIDENDS. 
Ack’and N. EifliODfgate fneet 
^laridge C. Alderfgaie itreet 
A'tfcip J. Burnley 
Hams J. Truro, Cornwall 
Seek S. Bury ftreet 
Eroacihent 3. Stainton 
lowii J. Aylesbury ftreet 
arr G.'j. bhefiielci 
Cary E. M. Plymouth 
Che'tbam R. Stockport, Chelhire 
Chamberlayne T. a^ d V/. VVilllams, 
Cumber;and ftreet 
Clean?Y \V. York 
C-aikT. Chatham 
Cock A. D. Marftia] fireel 
Comfort M. Brighton 
Coward J. Ulverftone, Lancafliire 
Corbett VV. Tokenhoufe yard. Loth' 
bury 
Cornford T.'and G. Mitford lane 
Cefe D. len. and jvin. Mark lane 
Croden W. Gloucefterihire 
Cocit D. ahd A . Marfliall ftreet 
Cuff T Barking, Effex 
rand J Kirby, Stephen 
Davies R. Bermo dfey 
Dick <v Finsbury lijuare 
Dobfon J. Liverpcol . 
Demages, st. Paul’s Church Yard 
Xlkins J.ar;dV.May, Liverpool 
Emery E, Brewood, Sraftbrd 
E oali W . Chipping-Norton 
I'arrel' C. Golport 
Fettes a, York 
Eilber J. Weeiey, Efiex 
Fofter J Manchefter 
EofterW. Great Grims by 
Gafiiey M. Liverpool 
Green J. Birmingham 
Griffith S. Cary ftreet 
Halford E. Brillpl 
Hart J. Cambridge 
Hart B. Plymouth 
Harrifon T. Camomile ftreet 
Harrifon S. M'.nchefter 
Hickox J. Worthing 
Hampton J. Woolwich 
Higgins W. Great St. Helen’s 
Howland T. Thame, Oxfordfhire 
Hodgfon J. fen. Coleman ftreet 
Hopwond E. Marfden, Lancafliire 
Henderlbn J. and A. Neifon, Milk 
ftreet 
Hedgfon J. Birmingham 
Jacob J. iN’ewgate ftreet 
Jones T. Birmingham 
Jones J. Hanover fquare 
Ivory !. Mark lane 
Kern L. and T. Muller, Paternofter 
rew 
Kemp J. Iflington 
Knight M. T, Hammerfmi'h 
Lee R. and D. Payne, Cheapfide 
Lee T. Poland ftreet 
Lumb W. and T. Leeds, Ycrklhirs 
Marfliall C. Little Hermitage ftreet? 
Manfon T. fen. and T. Manlbn, jun. 
Tokenhoufe Yard 
Mefienger W. Mitcham, Surry 
Megnell J. York 
Millar J. Liverpool 
M' nro j. Clipftone ftreet 
jvlundy A. Shrewton, Wilts 
Mukieficn R. Cannon ftreet 
Mumford T. and j. Skeen, Green¬ 
wich 
Paice A. Bridge ftreet, Lambeth 
Payee J. 
Pearkes J. St. Paul’s Church Yard 
Perkins N. fen. and jun. Clouceft?T» 
ftiire 
Pidler G. E. Oxford ftreet 
P' llinger G. H. Rofs'.ey, Ha' ts 
Kaine J. Woburn Court, Bloomsbury 
KeidT. H. M. Holborn 
Remardt R. and T. Kingfton upc* 
Hull 
Richards H. Strand 
Rowjardfon S., E, Ifaac, andW. Brien, 
Cheapfide 
Savagfe S. and J. Slack, Macclesfield, 
Chefter 
Sharland G. South Moulton, Devsn- 
fliire 
Smith E. Dalton 
Smith G. Warnford Court 
Smith I. H. Briftol 
Surtez J. ana A., R. Burden, J. 
Brandling, and J. Emblstor, Ber¬ 
wick upo I Tweed 
Tas'lor T. Birmingham 
Taylor C. Ertftoi 
Tellemach T. Petarlham, Surrey 
Tugweli T. Horfliam 
Tyndall J. Birmingham 
■Walker W Chancery lane 
Wainwrlght G. Sheffield 
Wells T., G. O. Tooke, Bank Side 
V.'hvte N., A. Graham, Biimingham 
Whitmarfli T. New Sarum 
William J. Swanfea 
Will T. H, Lamb’sCond it ftreet 
Welchman W. crewkerne, Somerfet* 
{hire 
Williamfon G.York 
Wilfon ). Golden fquare 
W'oodward w. Toitenhaj® 
Wyke W. Prefton. 
INCIDENTS, MARRIAGES, and DEATHS, in and near LONDON; 
IJ lih Biographical Memoirs of distinguished Characters recently deceased. 
JN addition to the particulars relative to the population of London, given in the Monthly 
Magazine of last month, we are now enabled to add the following: 
City of London 
Westminster 
The Borough 
Christ Church 
Lambeth 
Newington 
Rotherhithe 
Holborn Division, including only St. Giles’s, SL George’s, St. ? 
Andrew’s, St. Pancras, St Mary-le-bone, and Paddington 3 
Finsbury Division, including only St- Luke’s, St Sepulchre’s, 7 
Clerkenweil, and Islington __.^ 
Tower Division, omitting Hackney and Poplar ... 
Ke'nsingCon...... 
C^iiclsea .... .... .... .......a......... ... ...... 
Males. 
Females. 
Total. 
blS'G'i 
59,693 
116,755 
74,.538 
87,447 
162,185 
28,579 
32,590 
61,109 
.5,032 
6.818 
11,050 
17,935 
23,709 
41,644 
10,124 
13,729 
22,853 
4,649 
6,420 
14,069 
93,958 
124,633 
218,596 
37,690 
44,576 
82,266 
75,787 
111,606 
187,393 
4,244 
6,642 
10,886 
7,737 
10,595 
18,262 
945.06S 
Which nine HUNDRED and forty-five 
THOUSAND is the present population of tlie 
mass of connected houses called London. 
*1 he ne-wspaper writers have swelled it ano¬ 
ther 150,000, by including adjacent, but 
fiistunt vill ges, as Hampstead, Clapham, 
Kaclcncy, Finchley, Hornsey, Hammer- 
Eir/ith, and they have even travelled so far as 
Staines, Uxbridgej and Twickenham, to 
prove that the nuisance of an overgrown me-, 
tropo’is is greater chan it really is. In com¬ 
paring London with Paris, such extension 
should however be made, because the popu- 
Jaiiaa of Paris includes the entire arrondis- 
ment, and would take In all distances, like 
Twickenliani, Richmond, &c. ; hence t!ie 
present population of London as compared 
with Paris, would be at least 1.099,104, as 
stated in the papers. In 1801, the same 
district contained 1^3,13-9 fewer inhabitants; 
but at that time the returns were very de^ 
lective, owing to the apprehension of a 
capitation tax. 
At a meeting at the White Hart, Guild¬ 
ford, on Sati'.rcay, the 10 th of August, the 
Report of Mr, Josias Jessop, engineer, and 
also a plan and survey’ by him for making a 
navigable CAnai to connect the rivers VVey 
- g.nd 
