257 
Actiniaria *). Stuckey writes: “Presumably the young of this 
species are retained in the body till fully formed, for 1 found one 
specimen, which had twelwe young ones attached to the outside of 
the body-wall in a regular transverse circle about one-third of the 
height of the wall from the foot. If the young are not retained 
till they are considerably advanced, it is difficult to see how they 
Figs 50—53. Cricophorus nutrix. Figs. 50. 51. Specimen with 5 oung immi„rated (in 
fig 50 partlv) from the brood-room. Fig. 52. Specimen wilh a distinct annular fold 
bLderincr tbe invaginated brood-room. Fig. 53. Transverse section of the body through 
Uriu-ood-room (bt The embryos are removed. Figs. 50 52, 5T ^pecmens frorn 
North Cape, fig. 51. Specimen from Island Bay. Magoit. ^|^ (bgs. oO, ol), ■ /i (b„. o2). 
1) The circular brood-pouch here recalls that described by C lu bb 1902 
in Urticina {= Bunodactis, compare p. 196) sulcata and carlgreni. As 
far as 1 can see from C1 u b b’s paper and figures there is from the 
beginning a similar circular invagination in the column as in Crico- 
phorus, but from this invagination brood-pouches have sunk in between 
the mesenteries, thus a more advanced stadium of the brood-pouches 
than in Cricophorus, 
Vidensk. Medd. fra Dansk naturb. Foren. Bd. 77. 
17 
