142 
lowing are added here: Temnopleurus Reynaudi Ag., Åmblypneustes 
griseus Blv., Holopneustes inflatus Ltk., Brissopsis luzonica (Gray) 
and Metalia sternalis (Lamk.) (— besides the deep-water forms 
taken by the „Challenger“ in the vicinity of New Zealand and 
some species from the Kermadecs; these forms are not taken into 
consideration at the present occasion —). 
In the „Index Faunæ Novæ Zealandiæ“ 1904 Hutton again 
eliminates from the list of New Zealand Echinoids the species: 
Centrostephanus Rodgersii, Str. erythrogrammus, Sphærech. Åustraliæ, 
Holopneustes inflatus, Echinus margaritaceus, Laganum rostratum > 
and Metalia sternalis, while no new forms are added. 
Another addition was again made by Ben ham, 1909, in his 
Record of the Echinoderma of the N. Z. Government Trawling Ex- 
pedition, viz. Porocidaris elegans A. Ag. The same author*) also 
showed the „Salmacis globator “ of Hutton to be a new species 
of the genus Pseudechinus, naming it Ps. Huttoni. F. Jeffr. Bell * 2 ) 
in 1917 adds two new forms, Astropyga radiata Leske and Laga¬ 
num sp. Finally in the present report five new species are added, 
viz. Cidaris sp. Pseudechinus variegatus n. sp., Echinocyamus poly- 
porus n. sp., Laganum depressum Ag. (?) and Brissopsis zealandiæ 
n. sp. 
A revised list of the New Zealand Echinoids then looks as 
follows: 
Goniocidaris umbraculum Hutton 3 ). 
Porocidaris elegans A. Ag. — erroneous identification; = Ogmo- 
cidaris Benhami n. g. n. sp. 
Cidaris sp. 
Astropyga radiata Leske — erroneous identification; — Aræosoma 
thetidis (H. L. Clark). 
Centrostephanus Rodgersii Ag. — probably not New Zealand. 
Temnopleurus Reynaudi Ag. — not New Zealand. 
0 W. B. Ben ham. An erroneous Echinodermal identification. Ann. Mag. 
Nat. Hist. Ser. 8. Vol. I. 1908. p. 104. 
2 ) F. J e ffr. B e 11. British Antarctic („Terra Nova“) Expedition. Zoology 
Vol. IV. 1. Echinoderma. 
8 ) In the „Index Faunæ Novæ Zealandiæ“ this species-name has been 
curiously misprinted into »umbulacrum“. 
