Table A-57. 
recoveries. 


Contributing area 
EMU 
Wisconsin 
Illinois 
Indiana 
Ohio 
Kentucky 
Tennessee 
Alabama 
Mississippi 
Louisiana 
Subtotals 
CMU 
Montana 
North Dakota 
Minnesota 
South Dakota 
Wyoming 
Nebraska 
Iowa 
Missouri 
Kansas 
Colorado 
New Mexico 
Oklahoma 
Arkansas 
North Texas 
South Texas 
Subtotals 
WMU 
Washington 
Oregon 
Idaho 
Utah 
Nevada 
California 
Arizona 
Subtotals 
Totals 

~—6§D WY 
0.2 
0.2 0.0 
1.8 
0.4 
97.5 
100.0 
0.2 
99.8 100.0 
0.0 0.0 
100.0 100.0 
ETE EERE 
MOQ KS 
0.5 0.2 
1.2 0.1] 
2.1 
Tr 
0.2 0.) 
4.0 0.4 Q. 
19. 
0.4 0.5 2 
Q.] 
0.1 1.0 
0.4 
Q.] 0.5 
94.3 2.4 
0.3 93.7 ] 
0.1] 62 
0 
0.5 2 
0.8 0.2 
0.2 
96.0 99.6 98. 
0. 
0.0 0.0 1. 
100.0 
0. 
100.0 100. 
CO 
4 
—wonm— 
oma oO 
— ro 
97. 
dt 
100. 
OwWnnoO WwW @® 
mPOoOrWNY— 
—+~4 mr 
co Mm Ww Lo 
NM 
Central Management Unit harvest area (%) 
OK AR N.TX S.TX 
0.1 0.1 0.5 las 
0.3 0.8 
0.2 
Tr 0.1 
0.6 0.1 
T 
2.4 0.1 0.3 
0.5 0.3 0.7 
Dal 3.6 1.2 3.6 
0.2 0.3 0.4 
1.1] 3.0 3.4 
0.6 0.) 1.4 3.1 
0.6 3.1 Bae 
0.3 
0.2 3.4 5.6 
0.4 0.6 2.3 4.5 
be} 1.3 1.2 3.5 
2.5 6.2 8.7 
0.2 0.7 0.1] 
0.7 0.1] 
90.4 13.4 4.2 
Le 94.4 0.9 0.7 
0.4 58.5 7.8 
our 48.5 
99.9 96.4 98.3 95.8 
0.2 
Tr 0.1 
0.2 
0.1] 
0.2 0.3 
0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 
100 100.0 99.9 
-O 100.0 
TT rvwnmn—mn—"—“—~oOoos nn 
“Weighted. 
Derivation (%) of the mourning dove harvest* in the Central Management Unit, Mexico, and Central America. 
CMU total 
—$oox7noondtonon 
. Sj .2 ) Se ‘ 
— Ww Po 
cor ww 
— — 
WOn7AOFPMYIMFW—wOwoO——oO 
Oo — 
Oo H0o.0 6 —~ 
. ‘ 5 > e« * * > - . a 
Ww —Ono OAM MONMO~AA—UOFOW’NO 
oO 
‘Oo 
Ww 
Southern harvest area (%) 
Mexico 
oo- 
—-wWO 
0.1 
143 
eed 
a 
MHIwAIOMWUJPOMNMMONMNANHY 
. © «8 or a Ge ake Ze ele an Nels 
PHP HSH HFOwAyYWODWOW@MWNwW 
~~ 
Wa om Hw ry 
STOMP UOMO 
ho 
= 
Co 
oO 
oO 
All doves - direct 
Central America 
0.4 
— 
Woo po 
mmr © 
— 
hm 
mmm woo PRAY O 
OBanyteanndwnrnowo 
W 
100.0 
86 
