79 
principal generic character of the tarso-metatarsal bone in the Dinornis. The interspaces 
of the three articular terminations are wider, the two lateral ones diverging more, and 
being of larger size than usual ; they have also the median trochlear groove, but not so 
deep as in the middle articular process. 
A section of one of the smaller metatarsals shows the confluent compact walls of the 
three primitive constituents of the shaft, and the two thin bony partitions dividing the 
cavity of the bone into the three separate medullary canals, as far down as the middle 
of the shaft, where they cease, and a common medullary cavity is formed: the lower 
part of the common medullary cavity is divided by a single septum into two canals, 
which are continued into the coarse cellular structure of the divisions supporting the 
articulations of the inner and middle toes, as in most other birds. Pl, XXIX. fig. 5. 
The length of the tarso-metatarsal bone in the Dinornis is about half that of the tibia, 
as will be afterwards more particularly demonstrated. In the tridactyle Emeu the tarso- 
metatarsal bone is as long as the tibia; in the Ostrich and the Bustard it is a little 
shorter than the tibia. The still shorter proportion which it bears to the tibia in the 
Apteryx of New Zealand forms a striking resemblance between this bird and the Dinor- 
ms, But the Apteryx is distinguished from the larger Struthionide not more by its 
elongated slender bill than by the presence of a fourth small toe on the inner and back 
part of the foot, articulated to a slightly raised rough surface of the tarso-metatarsal, 
about a fourth of the length of that bone from its trifid distal end: the Dodo was also 
tetradactyle, like the Apteryx. Thus the tarso-metatarsal bone of the Dinornis distin- 
guishes that bird generically by its structure from the two last-named Struthionide, as 
it does by its shorter and stouter proportions from the Cassowary, the Emeu and the 
Rhea: the three well-developed anterior toes more obviously distinguish the Dinornis 
from the didactyle Ostrich. 
Proceeding now to the comparison of the three most perfect tarso-metatarsal bones 
of the Dinornis with each other, it will be obvious, from the subjoined table of admea- 
surements, that they differ from each other in their proportions as well as in their size. 
Dimensions of the Tarso-metatarsals, 
mi. m2. m 3. m5, m4, 
Tn, Lia. In, Lin. In, Lin, In. Lin. = In. Lin. 
Re eae dt ee ae dle ett cp ota h Seines 18 6 W4!'0 120 70 #£4=€610 
Girquinteponrn 6. GA ETE ila bei ocke emo & 4 3 a-+s + oo Dp 8 
PGs Kr Ciskal SUE os iweb ne tewierrethoe hee So 4 0 3 0 
Breqdt. of node of pbait-. 9.2. padeee peso pence 2 Ed 1 ies 1 5 Liat 
Thickness, or antero-posterior diameter of ditto 1 6 1. ae 0 9 0 9 
Thus the circumference of the middle of the shaft is as 11 to 37, or less than one-third, 
in the longest bone (m 1)*; in the second-sized entire bone (m 3)°* it is a little more than 
' According to the probable proportions of the articular extremities, when entire. 
2 Pl. XXVII, fig. 1. 3 Tb, fig, 2. 
