a. ee cee cnet” ee te 
226 
species of Dinornis. The upper division of the ridge is shorter in Dinornis elephan- 
topus than in Din. robustus, and relatively shorter than in Din. crassus. The sur- 
face between the fibular ridge and the inner border of the shaft, at the back part, is 
concave transversely in Din. elephantopus, not merely flat as in Din. robustus and Din. 
crussus; and, as it descends, it continues longer a flat surface before it changes gra- 
dually to a convex one. The oblong rough insertional surface above the inner condyle 
is relatively shorter and better defined in Din. elephantopus than in Din. robustus. On 
the characteristic fore part of the lower end of the tibia, that bone in Din. elephantopus 
repeats all the modifications ascribed to the genus Dinornis in my Memoir on the Gas- 
tornis, or large fossil bird from the Paris eocene’. 
The tendinal canal inclines obliquely inward, parallel with the inner border of the 
expanding end, near which it is placed (PI. LVI. fig. 4, f) : the bony bridge spans across 
it from a flattened tubercle developed from the lower part of the outer pier. The out- 
let of the canal is as wide as in Din. robustus; its aspect is obliquely forward and 
downward. External to the tubercle is an oblique rough depressioa, relatively narrower 
and better defined than in Dinornis robustus. The inner condyle, a, is relatively 
narrower and more produced forward than in Din. robustus, resembling more the pro- 
portions of that part in Din. crassus. The general form and oblique direction of the 
wide distal trochlear articulation of the tibia are closely repeated in all the species ; 
the concavity being rather more sharply defined behind in Din. elephantopus than in Din. 
robustus. The depression on the entocondyloid surface is less deep in Din. elephantopus 
than in the Din. robustus. 
The above specific differences, as well as all that I have noticed im the tibize of other 
species of Dinornis, are so inferior in degree to those which I have found in closely allied 
genera, and even in different species of the same genus, of other large land- and wading- 
birds, as ¢. g. in species of Ciconia, and in the existing Struthious genera, as to leave a 
strong impression on my mind of the generic affinity of the species of wingless birds of 
New Zealand which I have referred to Dinornis and Palapterya, and which species have 
been divided, with a more liberal imposition of terms, by Dr. Reichenbach, into the 
nominal genera Anomalopterya, Movia, Emeus, Syornis, &c. ; no other facts or characters 
being assigned for that multiplication of generic names than those which are to be 
found in the pages or plates of the Memoirs contributed by me to the Zoological 
Transactions. 
Fibula of Dinornis elephantcpus. 
The fibula o Dmornis elephantopus remains, as in other Dinornithes, and as in the 
existing Struthious genera, permanently distinct from the tibia. As a general rule 
in Birds, the fibula soon becomes anchylosed to the tibia. In the species now defined, 
it is a straight styliform bone, 14 inches 6 lines in length (Pl. LVI. fig. 6). The head is 
' Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, 1856, vol. xii. p- 210, pl, 3. fig, 2 

