Table 1, --Waterfowl Breeding Potential, Michigan 1 
besults of Strip censuses taxen by [District dame kanagers on important 
breading praunces in their respective districts. Censusss wars taken by tra- 
FaTaing strean& or marshes oy boat. 
* Corrasponding numbers on Table 1 indicate lo¢ation of consus areas. 
** Aspressnts these birds bslong to species that do not normally nest in Michigan. 













uy 
7 
G3 . Gt ti} 
2 i mo ae 
= sr on Pe ‘a v7 ei rf c 
i A ee oe 2 
a wt aa | rd ra | Ba | m2 at a th 
Se a rine m7 24 4 a v4 LI] ut 
Ga ee oo BT i yy Eby o a 5 2 
ee iS nS aq «9a & 3d ak 
= a Ut wy a a ts i mi k nh, = 
Sg 2 84 8 S$ 62 6 gf B¥ 
a ve 3 a ry a 2 is 4 myo: a Tape ni a 
L Portare harsh Se 
Houghton Co, 6.5 aie 18 ort 45 0 é, 8) 
= Hayward Lake 
Menomines Co, Be 3 7 1,27 23 a 2 if 
Portage Harsh 
; eigen Census Made but Data Not Comparabls 
4 Potearanissing R. 
Chipuewa Co. 8.0 2.0 54 6.75 zs i g 6 Zz 
5 Thunder Eay R, 
Alpene Ca. 12,9 wey ley Mee 56 a 2 0 
& Pe-to-+ba-go Harsh 
Gr. Jraveras Co. Li 625 SF OT 108 a) L i) 
7 Lei otream 
Fascoumon Co, Lay 5 TR a3 a3 df, 1é 2 a 
4 huskepon RB, 
Muskegon Co, 18 1.2 46 25 384 0 5 5 
9 Nayenyuinh Pt. 
Ray Co. 4 1.5 39 103 206 123% 4 a 
10 Grane Giver 
Ottawse Oa. 5 20° 7 Fak ca 0 , 0 
ll Huron iver 
Vashtenaw Co. a oi * O J 0 a a 
ig Pts. Mouiles | 
Wouras Ca, eat & ae 1255 BE 1 3 La 
13 talasazoo &. 
Allegan Co, 12 ao Loe 26 0 3 O 
l4 Saginaw RK. 
Saginoey: Ceo. ae ene 
15 Ssbswaing Bay 
uron Co. “ Ho Raport 
16 St. Clair Flats oi 
St. Clair Coa, ss i. 3 12 0 - Q 
Totels 10,35 580 6.8 56 &t é he 
198 
