70 Report oF DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY OF THE 
TABLE X.—RELATION BETWEEN NITROGEN AND PHospHORUS OUTGO. 



March 10-16 
April 12-18 
eee eee 
ee ewes s 
April 28-May 1....! 
May 9-15 
May 22-26 
* The soluble includes the inorganic. 
«8 Bl eras 6,16 ta) 









| NITROGEN. DAILY INCOME AND OUTGO OF PHOSPHORUS. 
"Fed [Outeo! © isuacaeth nor, Biers keer 
daily. | daily. | Fed. Oe ganic Rick Oe Te cave 
| | fed. fed creted. excreted. |_xcreted. 
i\Grms | Grms.| Grms.,| Grms. Grms. | Grms. Grms. Grms. 
L7S 1 e190 4) 1258 5.18 2.6 POX TS 16.2 14.2 
209 48205 147807 EAA 2.6 7056 60.8 56.7 
215 | 215 | 16.0 6.9 | 2.6 23.8 | 15.2 Loe 
| 215.4 208 | 83.8 54.7 2.6 70.4 62.9 OTaL 
Z16 4° 20074 2154 Weed 320 22.4 14.9 12% 
| | 
TABLE XI.—EFFECTS OF THE INGESTION OF PHOSPHORUS COMPOUNDS UPON 
THE COMPOSITION OF THE MILK, SHOWN BY PERIODS. 
pn 

March 10-16 
April 2=18 se. ees 
April 28-—May 1 
33 
S/d.) pes 
eee eeens 







Total IN THE MILK. 
phoss) 8 et a 
phorus 
fed. Proteids. | Casein Fat Sugar. 
Grms. Per ct. Per ct. Per ct Per ct 
44 Peery FM 12.8 2.52 2.08 3.26 5.59 
eRe ace this 74 QDS Phra Wy Sy kil 5.62 
i ee ae 16.0 2.58 eit 2.55 5.65 
avr REE 83.3 2.ol 2515 S.et 5269 
Ve are 21.4 2.64 Sats 2°20 5295 
Shy ae Led PIA ATE Zohan 2eO3 5.64 
Be ao, 80.7 24735 Bel SIP a 5.48 








TABLE XIJ.—EFFECTS OF THE INGESTION OF PHOSPHORUS COMPOUNDS UPON 
THE YIELD OF MILK AND MILK SOLIDS AND UPON THE EXCRETION 


DATE, 
Apri12-18i8.. ak 
oe 's.\8 6, 10\0)'5 8 
eee eeeens 
ee eer eee 
see ee 

NIHR 0 A100 





oF URINE. 
Vield DAILY YIELD MILK SOLIDS. 
apt ny he ee 
daily Casem, 74 : 
nitrogen. Fat Solids 
Grms. Grms. Grms. Grms. 
16335 Deven 531 1856 
12813 42.8 400 1454 
12027 40.8 | 306 1296 
11018 Sy beea || 368 1276 
13833 47.4 | 305 1495 
12043 43.6 |  350| 1359 
10428 SW ate" | 341 1204 

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS OF EXPERIMENT 1. 
The following is a somewhat concise statement of the main 
results of the foregoing experiment, a fuller discussion being re- 
served until after a consideration of the outcome of further experi- 
ments. 
1. The comparative nutritive value of the rations —It is shown 
by the figures of Table 3 that outside of the changes brought 
