he, ee ht eee Oe eae oe a ee Pet oe ees jue ee 
ed i et : vt? % me _* > OS ae = fy Fy - 
: 2 “ve Fa: 
~— 
"9 re | (AssEMBLY | bs 
Whole potatoes used as seed : ‘ 
Corrected to 594 
hills per plat. 
Merch. Total. Merch. Total. 
Lbs. - Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. 
EWES ae asst tenet e oceie ete verge LTT 780.9 880.0 
PNG oi Meta eerie ebig Rd ee 910.3 1051.8 911.8 1058.5 
TOD <2 DENS Sage po Al eta 1187.2 1338.0 1198.2 1844.8 
Kvorace >. 0s. fy. 958.1 1089.1. 961.9 1092.8 
We have then for the averages of the plats: 
As harvested. Calculated to 594 hills. 
Merch. Total. Merch. ~ Total. 
Seed used. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. 
EDM G-CVOB..-5 20 oe nei sees eet 490.5 524.8 515.4 550.2 
Quarter potatoes ......2...- OT Se (Bom 687.8 744.7 
BEINITEDOLALOCS =. sass at<be ave « 838.5 915.0 840.2 916.9 
Wihole potatoes s,s. eee 958.1 1089.1 961 9 1092.8 
- As there was no rot this year, the difference between the mer- 
chantable and total represents the small potatoes. These on the 
average were : 
As harvested. Calculated to 594 hills 
: Lbs. per ct. Lbs. per ct. 
fnvcingle eyes... .!5 hee. tee 34.3 or 6.5 34.8 or 6.7 
In‘quarter potatoes... ......... - 55.8 0r 7.5 56.9 or 7.6 
dn:half- potatoes... 05). iie. os 76.5 or 8.3 76.7 or 8.3 
In whole potatoes ............ 131.0 or 12.0 130.9 or 12.0 
That the single eyes were inferior in yield is best shown by 
arranging the various plats in order of yield, and placing the vari- — 
ous seedings in adjoining columns. This we do, and the answer 
given by inspection of the table is conclusive as to results in the 
station plats this year. Our figures are calculated to the acre of 
11,880 hills. 
Merchantable crop: bushel per acre; arranged in order of 
amount of yield: 
' 
a,y* . 
Le ee ee eee 

yay ee td 

