

a D > @ oe a a. 
3 Adee AEE ae lip Be 
ra H a. io) Or o° 
1885. a O Q 8 aa eae Bé 
oo »-& i= ae BB aD 
3 ee | se | g22 | gf | Be | wh 
No. 1, in sod. & & & & bog A bo 2 = Fm 2 
agipss | bas | Bee | Se | a 
a 6 zm Z ee ie 
MHMMEV Sebo 2... -~-- 1 fiore ohh 4 et re}fs eis 5 
Peete ee Se 22g S20 ee aoe _ sata 
Marchoosti (fie t_ ieust HO Ol Lard, A. he ee i ate 
LOSES 19.9 1.5 274 4.43 4,704 0.8 
Bee ot oh - rap a pee fil eve: haa 
Pewee 2 o,  . oo aga #1 EUEt Be bs Bet 
AN a a ae ae oe mers ati apa eae 
ee as eam py a wap 3 mee ase cpp 
mencem ber. = 2-522 ae ies ates Uh a wh SUE 
Pinto berr rosy els oe, SLi ae SD a wey alge 
INavember.- -22-5---.. ae 4 pete Bey 3 ir wake ’ 
TE i: re 14 2.9 .166 3.33, 3.5 .22 
Lysimeter No. 2, bare soil. 
LETTE os a oh 55.3 4.4 285 39.90 | 40.185 2.4 
GU MIBM Vee SE os oy. sha Con ees mi, Ba ge BS/,4 
MurCN S347. se. Gages f fle. oar we 
PeOriiwee ee ee ee ce. 78.3 a4 812 102.09 | 102.902 16.3 
4s pt ed oe 2 ea Epys). ae A 43 Eft ae eas 
VNC See oe feet ae. ne oa ar weeps aie 
SUNN: | ays 2 55.44 3 066 92.43 | 92.5 32.7 
LATICO an eg ee 74.76 2.8 10 119.00 | 119.1 36.3 
September_........--. 68.11 8.2 115 123.48 | 123.6 54.7 
Pemtciierees ore rt 72,24 2.6 12 125. 125.12 29.4 
November .:..-....-.. rf 3 175 137.4 | 187.575 22.2 
December _..-.---- ee tie e OM, 1.5 .083 94.62 | 94.7 24.7 
Lysimeter No.3,cultivated 
soil. 
TT a pega 41.65 9 0 20.75 | 20.75 1.2 
MUGELALY Wie, Woon Et oe a Lee. OSL. LE 
Utes ey RY ee) ae ok ny ae re ay Avie 
eal Pp eS a 48.7 1 121 65.05 | 65.17 24,2 
Unies ee as weet we aes i ee oe See init ees 
ea Cee er 52.78 9 066 91.884] 91.40 Leek 
pe a i gl ir 50.12 ie 008 82.292} 82,30 30.5 
PeUPUs eyes wa. - 2 50.05 9 04 94.4 94,44 33.3 
September ..-_.-__---- 48.86 k .049 92.65 | 92.70 52.6 
Ot es 55.65 ls .044 100. 100.04 22.9 
Provembperss.. o. . 8. 58. 1.1 .092 103. 103.09 14.9 
Deécémber’. 202. 2222. al! 1. .05 104.95 | 105. 21.5 
FERTILIZERS. 

297 




Only one analysis of fertilizers has been made during the past 
year, and we were led to the examination of this one by the obvious 
misrepresentations of the circular which accompanied it. ‘The bul- 
letin which announced the result of this analysis is inserted in full, 
showing as it does, clearly the fraudulent character of the article. 
