Marca, 1916. METEORITE COLLECTION — CATALOGUE 233 
MMO rE iw Oh el ew se ipl vee yo 897 andividuals 
ERE Cis ke a ae eee 38 individuals 
RMON! se ID a ilk wd 27 individuals 
Cr i SO aes tia eee individuals 
A ne I a 34 individuals 
Also of the following falls one or more complete, or nearly complete, 
individuals are included in the collection: Admire, Agen, Ahumada, 
Arispe, Barratta (2), Bath Furnace, Bielokrynitschie, Bischttibe, 
Bishop Canyon, Blanket (2), Blansko, Bluff, Cangas de Onis, Crab 
Orchard, Davis Mountains, Dokachi, Dofia Inez (5), Gilgoin, Glorieta 
Mountain (2), Hessle (3), Homestead (2), Indarch, Kyushu, Leighton, 
Limerick, Llano del Inca (2), Los Reyes, Modoc (3), Nagy-Borove, 
Nejed, Pickens County, Plainview, Quinn Canyon, Scott City (2), 
South Bend, Stannern and Vaca Muerta. 
The form and arrangement of this catalogue are similar to those of 
previous catalogues of the collection, the arrangement being an alpha- 
betical one for all falls, with a description, weight and number for each 
Specimen. ‘The classification given to each fall has been in the main 
that assigned by Brezina in the Ward-Coonley catalogue.* Where 
obvious discrepancies occur, however, they have been noted by the 
writer. Insome cases where there was a lack of correspondence between 
the specimen and Brezina’s classification, sufficient material did not 
‘seem to be at hand to warrant suggesting a change, while in other 
cases it appeared that Brezina’s determination might have been based 
on insufficient material. A determination of the classification of each 
meteorite in whatever collection possessed the largest quantity of the 
fall would, in many cases, be desirable, although even with a large 
amount of material individual judgments might differ. The writer 
has followed Cohent in grouping together the various falls of Great 
Nama Land (Amalia, Great Fish River, Lion River, Mukerop and 
Springbok River) under the single name of Bethany. This reduces 
the number of falls from that region considerably from those usually 
listed, but the great similarity of the etching figures of these meteorites 
make it seem probable to the writer, as it has to other authorities, that 
these masses had a single origin. Berwerth{ has been followed in 
grouping the Japanese falls, Oshima, Hishikari, Maeme and Shigetomi, 
under the single name of Kyushu. In the case of Coahuila the various 
irons have been grouped according to the practice which has now 
‘become common. Effort has been made to exclude all doubtful falls 
and if in the practice of this principle some specimens which may later 
*Catalogue of the Ward-Coonley Collection, Chicago, 1904, pp. 97-103. 
TMeteoritenkunde, Heft 3, p. 324. 
tFortschritte der Min. Krist. u. Pet. 1912, Bd. 2, 234. 
