

122 REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE 
made.in all 465 analyses each of morning’s and evening’s milk, so 
that these results may be regarded as conclusive; but itis quite 
possible and even probable that far different results might follow 
with animals which, from one cause or another, were subjected to 
other conditions which might tend to disturb the exercise of so 
important a function as the secretion of milk, which, as has been. 
shown, appears normally to proceed with surprising regularity. 
The yield of milk showed a slight excess in the evening’s milk 
over the:-morning’s, or as 100 to 100.6, and this is so slight that an’ 
average difference of two and one-fifth minutes in the time of 
milking might have caused it, but that the evening’s milk also 
contained a little more water than the morning’s milk. The 
rations of the several solid constituents being as follows: 
Morning’s Evening’s 
milk. milk. 
PROtA] BOLIAK: os SERA s oc © Fiala a Wie IeUute ol die RRS ae oat See 98.98 
TEBE o'ss.0's's c/n et 9 te iatpseeh ofa aie atehe kia gece aia ERR tia a aet 100 99.06 
CIASOING. 6/0'5 indi 4 eleldin leo diale CWEid Siena nR Dy cette sora 100 98.34 
POUL RE sos iets « atelapeereeaeete La Gata anAD og: o Whee sles wha. Pk ALOE 99.42 
Vs nar, RIMS S57 8 LolnG NG Bi 1c a RR Nk Se Sg a | 97.56 
—_—S—_—— SS 

