216 Report ON Crop PRODUCTION OF THE 
POTASH TEST FORMULAS. 
These formulas were compounded from the same materials as 
the two already described, the potash varying from nothing in 
No. 1 to 10 per ct. in No. 4. 
FORMULA NO.1. FORMULA NO. 3. 
Composition. Composition. 
NItFOPEN 5 Se ps 4.0 per ct. Nitrogen 4; «<5 teams 4.0 per ct. 
Available phos. acid... 8.0 ‘* Available phos. acid... 8.0 
PORE eh Gre ee eis Ss Oe a See OT aR EEE aa «0004 55 6 a 
FORMULA NO. 2. FORMULA NO. 4. 
Composition. - Composition. 
NISTOS@CT Lee sob esheets 4.0 per ct. Nitrogen! i0.% 1. ¢.5i8) ~ 4.0 per ct. 
Available phos, acid... 8.0 “ Available phos. acid... 8.0 “ 
POL aa erik ee tes the beats eee Om tae. Potash cc 4. oc 35 eee «ALO ge 
The arrangement and numbering of the plats, and the amounts 
and kinds of fertilizer were the same on each farm. Below can 
be seen the relation between the number of the plat and the 
amount and kind of fertilizer: 
FERTILIZERS APPLIED ON PLATS. 
Potato Formula. L.I. Formula. 
Plat No. 1, no fertilizer. Plat No. 11, no fertilizer. 
rs 2, 500 lbs. Mixture No. 1. “12; 500 ‘lbs. Mixture No: a, 
fe 8 NOOR aL hss seb STOOD Me ane ss 
hae to ere Cit) eee a Ps sega bts Oe c 
rt 5, 2000 +, 24 * 1415). 2000 Mi o 
¢ 6, no fertilizer. “<*> 16, no Terthizer f 
” 7, 600 Ibs. Mixture No. 2.° _ ‘* -17, 500 Ibs. Mixture No. 4. 
a 8, 1000 § “ saipiante ohh Be, | & ‘s 
t 9 21500%. 2 ite oes bs Beth se “6 
35 OF"Z000 “ <1 se" 20, 2000 - ve 
Potash Test Formulas. 
Flats 21 and 26. No fertilizer, 
C8 S22 anaes Formula No. 1. 
eS ANG egos ef Pe sae 
“ . 94 and 29.- 44 ban 
“+ 25-and 30. =" Sond 
The total number of plats on the four farms to which each 
particular quantity of fertilizer was applied is seen to be sixteen, 
excepting that each potash test mixture was applied to only 
eight. 
