Zone 2 (20% sample) Zone 3 (10% sample) 
Sector Reported kill Sector Reported kill 
A 12 A 20 
B 8h B 21 
D 9 D 20 
E 63 E 30 
F ho F 1 
G ati c _0 
255 92 
255 x 5 = 1,275 92 x 10 = 9Je0 
*Estimated kill on unreported farms (from observations, etc.). 
Table 7 - ESTIMATED TOTAL HARVEST 
Actual Bag 
State-managed blinds 3,002 
Zone 1 - reported k 020 
Zone 1 - correction 1 
Zone 1 - unreported farms 325 
Zone 2 - projected kill 1,275 
Zone 2 - projected kill 920 
State area south of refuge 300 
Actual Bag 10,593 
Total Loss to Flock 
State-managed area 3,873 (kill and oe 
Zone 1 6,550 (kill and cripples 
Zone 2 1,275 (kill only) 
Zone 3: 920 (kill meal 
State marsh south of refuge 300 (kill only 
Crippling loss on State area 
south of refuge, and zones 1 
and 3 - estimated at 5%. 176 
Total loss to flock 13,094 
Costs 
Approximately 120 man-days were spent on the kill survey in 1960. This 
includes preliminary contacts, distribution of forms, pick-up of forms, 
analysis of data, and compilation of the final reports. Classifications 
ranging from laborer at $1.75 an hour to GS-12 were involved. Probably the 
average wage of a GS-7 would be a mean figure, so the cost is estimated at 
$20 a day. Tims, an intensive field survey such as used at’ Horicon in 1960 
will cost about $2,400 in salaries. Transportation has been averaged out at 
about $2.50 a day, for another $300; while depreciation of vehicles, per 
diem, and materials cost an additional $300. Thus, the entire survey cost 
18 
