Table 
le 
20 
36 
4. 
50 
6. 
7. 
8. 
9. 
10. 
11. 
12. 
13. 
14. 
15. 
16. 
17. 
LIST OF TABLES 
Wings received from hunters in the Mississippi Flyway 
in response to request letters @eeoceesersercerssoceeesoenn 
Wings received from outside the Mississippi Flyway 
in response to request letters SeeoOeneeeeeceecacseeseseoenna 
Wings received from volunteers in the Mississippi Flyway .. 
Scientific names of species mentioned in this report 
(fifth edition A.0. U. check-list) CoeTT FF eS CED O DEES HERE ES 
Calculation of weighting factors cocceccssceccesecceccceesd 
Response TACES ceecoaereeersreessaroec vec eeeroeeseeeeeeecene 
Effect of follow-up letter on response TAtTeS evoseevvcesece 
Percentage of respondents who returned all the 
envelopes they received originally ecscoccccccecssenacece 
Use of supplemental envelopes by 27 duck hunters secccceeec 
Distribution of the duck kill within the 1959-60 
season as indicated by the Mail Questionnaire 
Survey and Mail Wing Collection @o@¢eeosueceonoeeeoeaoeeoces eo 8ogcedc 
Percentage distribution of duck kill by days of 
the week (excluding opening day) Qoe eee ees eoeoaeooranees ens 
Comparisons of daily percentages of kill 
(excluding Sunday) in Ohio, Illinois, and Michigan o.ooe. 
Distribution of the kill within the day eeeesesnseececessenec 
Comparison of morning and afternoon kilI1s ceceoceccescceces 
Comparison of hunting success in three states as 
indicated by the relative number of days on which 
various size bags were reported Coe oHeeereoovesoo0R008 90008 
Species composition of the duck kill in the Mississippi 
Flyway as shown by the 1959 Wing Collection osecorceceesee 
Species composition of the 1959 kill (percentage of 
: tetal kill) in four parts Of Minnesota caeooovccsc0eseccen 
Page 
Ate 
46 
46 
47 
49 
50 
51 
51 
52 
53 
56 
57 
58 
61 
62 
63 
65 
