Table 4. 
Summary of Call-count Routes by States. 
Ineludes all routes run in 1961 but only comparable routes 


for 1960. 
ALABAMA 
Rt. Heard Seen Rt. Heard Seen 
No. County 1960 1961 1960 1961 No. County 1960 1961 1960 1961 
5R Madison 5k hy 36 33 69R Perry-Hale 65 39 1 OT 
8R Colbert- 75R Lee-Macon 28 O18 5 25 
Franklin 18 3 10 121 76R Lee 23 «22 2 2 
20R Morgan- TTR Choctaw wh 612 3 6 
Marshall 45 =O 2h 32 81R Dallas 17 2 5 12 
2°R Cherokee- 89R Wilcox 14 9 10 6 
Etoweh 20 «(9 4) =6102 QOR Wilcox- 
23R Cherokee- Butler 23 9 2 9 
DeKalb yO KG 35 22 96R Choctaw- 
29R Etowah 39 «(37 2 h Washington 4 2 2 ©) 
3uR Walker 28 = 38 21 Oh 9OR Monroe 6 mn a: h 
35R Jefferson 23. 18 18 10 103R Pike-Coffee- 
43R Jefferson 14 22 6 6 Barbour 3L 025 20 10 
7R Claburne- 105R Barbour- 
_ Randolph 2k 25 22 17 Henry 37.32 20 21 
52R Shelby-Bibb 7 mn -- 1 107R Clarke 23-30 5 27 
59R Hale-Perry 14 10 3 1. 16R Washington- 
63R Coosa- Mobile 3 7 0 9 
Elmore Tat 3 11 1 121R Covington 8 12 6 6 
ARTZONA 
1 Graham e2.)6038—Ca152 «1 11 Greenlee 36 «320=Sss«d127)—s«18hk 
2 Graham 1 61 27 22 12 Yavapai 27 «22 Ae 6 
3 Santa Cruz 33 67 17 2 13 Coeonino 7 6 3 nl 
, Pima 17 28 72 164 14 Yuma 25 3 64 131 
5 Maricopa 19 10h 86 498 15 Mohave 36 109 32 105 
6 Maricopa 32 «©65530«(O45 ke 16 Maricopa “7 38 77 2ho 
7 Marieopa 2h 286 174 315 17 Santa Cruz -- 34 w= 69 
8 Maricopa 22 662 27 =: 33 19 Yuma 26 37 «101 #182 
9 Maricopa 18 20 38 6 21 + Coehise. 5 12 15 6 
10 Pima 31 Uu 7] 29 

Lf 
