
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
ADStract secccccncccrccnncveeccencnsccssasoeccsceesecsccesere 
Table of COntentS cecccccvccccccccceccrcscccsvceccccsccsesece 
INtrOduCtion seccsccccccreccccccccccsccncesesesecsescsesesees 
Banding effort eeccccccacccvcerescesececccccsccnccecccccecees 
Uses and limitations of the data coceccccccccccccsccccsseccees 
Pre=hunting season banding CCOCH EEE OC OSC EEO EOT OC OSELEOOES 
Breeding~ground banding BOSCH EHSFEH ECL EE EOESESELEEOERELERS 
Wintering=-ground banding escecovecscccccsccccccenscceceses 
Distribution pattern of recoveries rae eervEyvereeeeerEererery ey eS 
Direct recovery TATCS coccccvcescccccsceseevesseeresecesecece 
Annual changes in recovery rate ceccccccccsccsccccccecce 
Recovery rate of locals and immatures eeceeceeessenceeee 
Regional differences in recovery rateS seeccccccssccccccs 
Differences between age groups in the recovery rate cece 
Differences between harvest areas in relative recovery 
PACE Sio-6 ose stan Obese 0:40e Oe 8 Oe OS 8 65 6 OOS OOO E8 O68 Ok OR. 
Estimate of the proportion of the pre-season wood duck © 
population bagged Be eee EEE TT OE RC oe 
Pre-season population EStimateS cecccccccccesceccceseesscesese 
Summary COCSHSSEHOCSSHEHSAEHSHHSHHOHHS EES EHO HE HOES HSE SESE HEHEE EELS 
Literature Cited csecsesccccecsecnssceresetesesssescescseneces 
Tables ded wicca atelacuie Shateiinetoa a1ote aU pseiaw athtere pel aseibie Ace wate ele aide hise's 
111 
Page 
di 
iii 
OG) 1M NAD - 
w 
on OpAHLAL 
Vs] ~] ov oO 
10 
