Table 2. Summary of,Wood Duck Direct Recovery Rates for June-October 
Bandings, 1959-1960. 

State -of Year Number Banded Number Recovered Direct Recovery Rate 
* Banding Banded Ad. Imm Loc. Ade Imm Loc. Ad. Imm Loc. | 
Oregon 1959 ~ - 14 - - 0 - s+ (20) 
1960 - - 72 - - 6 - = 4.6 
Manitoba 1959 50 = - 0 - ~ 0.0 - 
1960 26 o - 0 = - (0.0) - - 
Minnesota 1959 185 375 81 13 £3121 8. 760 8&3 %9 
1960 87 108 35 8 10 tl 9.2 92 (2. 8) 
Wisconsin 1959 258 638 $22 16 #52 l 6.2 82 4.5 
1960 534 1,534 123 35 151° 15 6.3 98 12.2 
Michigan 1959 183 185 126 17 22 8 9311.9 6.3 
1960 127 204 45 5 18 3 3.9 8.8 (6.7) 
New York 1958 53 456 - 4 41 - 7.5 90 = 
1959° 130 £199 95 2 11 5 15 5.5 5.3 
1960 160 496 3 7 39 1- 4.4 7.9 (33.3) 
Vermont 1958 73 274 47 11 37 6 15.1 13.5 (12.8) 
1959 111 #183 16 9 22 l 8.1 12.2 (6.2) 
1960 225 573 15 17 53 0 766 9.2 (0,0) 
Ne Hampshire 1959 : 39 —i«és - l -— - (26) - 
1960 - 40 - = 0 - (0.0) = 
Massachusetts 1959 . 35 9 - 0 1 (.0) (11-1) - 
1960 50 59 - 0 4 0.0 68 - 
Ohio 1959 79 49 262 6 4 11 7-6 (8.2) 4.2 
1960 66 53 414 0 2 5 00 3.8 1.2 
Indiana 1959 128 97 23 4 2 1 321 2.1 G.3) 
1960 436 294 70 3=—. 22 23 0 5.0 7.8 0.0 
Illinois 1959 71 266 6 8 8.4 30 - 
-1960 132 904 5 60 - 3.8 6.6 =: 
Iowa 1959 45 178 18 2 13 1 (4.4) 7.3 (5.6) 
1960 41 445 110 3 42 6 (723) 94 54 
Missouri 1959 122 = 330 51 6 21 1 4.9 6.4 2.0 
1960 195° [87 26 8 6 3 4.1 3.2 (11.5) 
Continued----- 
32. 
