CT 
Table 1. Mallard Preseason Banding and Direct Recovery Rates, 1959 and 1960 (Cantinued). 
ee SS e—————e——E—=EeEoaanBaBaoaoaEaEaEaEeaEeaoOoOoOooaeEoeoaEoaooEeeeeeeeeeEEeEeeeE— 


1959 1960 
: Number Number Direct Recovery Number Number Direct Rew very 
State or Banded Recovered Rate (Per eent) Banded Recovered Rate (Per cent) 
Province - Bander and Location Ad. Inm. Ad. Imm. Ad. Imm. Ad. Imm Ad. Imm Ad.  Imn, 
Ontario Edward Kroll: } f 
Oshawa 51 152 6 24 11.8 15.8 17) s-:125 1 17 (5.9) 13.6. 
Misc. Banding 
Misc. Locations _1l 51 0 4 (00.0) 7.8 _9 _20 0 4 72 (20.0) 
Totals 52 203 6 28 11.5 13.8 17. =145 1 21 5.9 14.5 
Michigan Kellogg Bird Sanc.: 
At Sanctuary | 39 85 3 4 7o-7 467 24 65 2 9 (8.3) 13.8 
Seney NWR: 
At Refuge 31 148 2 21 6.4 14.2 29 235 4 34 13.8 14.5 
Shiawassee NWR: 
At Refuge 22 347 1 42 (4.5) 12.1 93 665 7 102 725 15.3 
Misc. Banding 
Misce Locations 10 8 ee (10. 0) (25. 0) 2 9 _0 1 (0.0) (11.1) 
Totals 102 588 7 69 6.9 11.7 148 974 13 146 8.8 45.0 
Indiana Dept. of Conservation: ; 
Willow Slough SGP 46 34 4 5 8.7 14.7 219 147 19 $13 8.7 8.8 
Misc. Banding: 
Misc. Locations 8 34 0 1 GMO) 29 0 _1 0 0 _=- (000) 
Totals 54 68 4 6 $74 88 219 148 19 13 8.7 88 
Continued=------ 
