Table 1. Mallard Preseason Banding and Direct Recovery Rates, 1959 and 1960 (Continued). 
1959 1960 
Number Number Direct Recovery Number Number Direct Recovery 
State or Banded Recovered Rate (Per eent) Banded Recovered Rate (Per cent) 
Province Bander and Location Ad. Imm Ad. Imm. Ad. _Inm, Ad. Imm Ad. Imm. Ad. Imm, 
Ohio Misc. Banding: 
Misce Locations 13 0 6350 C1 SC10ss C77) «=—286 
Totals 13 35 1 10 (7.7) 28.6 
Quebec Misce Banding: 
Misc. Locations 5 42 +(.1 _5 (@0.0) 11.9 
Totals 5 42 1 5 (20.0) 11.9 
New York NeYe Cons. Depts: 
Perch Lake 85 506 5 56 5e9 11.1 81 618. 7 85 8.6 13.8 
Wilson Hill 36 89 1 13 2.8 14.6 48 44 3 9 6.2 20.4 
Howland Island 1 44 0 O (00.0) 00.0 258 326 15 27 5.8 8.3 
7 Vischers Ferry & 21 0 5 (00.0) (23.8) 18 85 3 8 (16.7) 94 
on * 
Montezuma NWR: 
At Refuge 46 100 7 dil 15.2 11.0 
Misc. Banding 
Misc. Locations 1l 41 _l 4 (991) 98 = i 2 _5 (100.0) (41.7) 
Totals 137. 701 7 78 5.1 11.1 453 1,185 36 144 8.0 12.1 
Delaware Bombay Hook NWR: 
| At Refuge 180 62 8 i 3.9 1.6 271 8378 _& 22 2.2 _5.8 
Totals 180 62 7 1 3.9 1-6 271 378 6 22 222 5.8 
Vermont Fish & Game Service: 
Dead Creek 11 100 2 15 (18.2) 15.0 34 161 3 #1 8.8 13.0 
Misc. Banding: 
Misc. Locations _1 35 _0 3 (00,0) _8.6 5 18 2 2 (40.0) (1.1) 
Totals 12 135 2 18 £=(16.7) 413.3 39 179 5 23 12.8 12.8 

" a Rates dexiwed from sampies of 25 ducks or less are in parentheses. 

