












the second year for carly egese 
FY 
@ 
end few Hungarians. 41 
given pens represent pr 
Mr Evans is of the opinion that there are no geographic 
ecient vermin-conti 








+-n 

only ¥ 
itions. 
coy} anf 
Oj an d 
er are provided. 
- > hs 3 a 2 ‘ a 46} ¢ + ti Aclan ta A we ie Ws he |  eatyt ant f Ag 
Quails & Pheasants. iS whe oheasant ‘tAdap ted “to Civilization?” |The 
Quails & Pheasants. Is the Phase’ 5 ees 
teh 6 Tn amnmanatkeawr sah Als at on ‘ ” he raw + ‘ amannat tyr ¢ 
that the greatest abunaance of pheasants and the greavess scarci Ty 
| 2 pa a 17 x dat ee Fae Lage eee Be > a eS 
quail both occur in the Lake region might to the 

4; 


to 
2 OV = 
an 
CAG 
Bs 
U 
vheasants ainterfere with the quail. 
a 4.1, Pen ce he nm ae or ay fet a 
by the fact that in south-cent 
there are fewer pheasants (onJ 
conclusion is contradi 
I , in not dissimilar « sountry, there are plenty of both,jand by the 
fact that the scarcity of uail seems to out-date the introduction of 
pheasents, Nelson reporting. them as only "common" as far back as 1877 
Cahn of the Universit of Tllinois is publishi a paper on th 
relation of quail and pheasant. 
This is not @ closed question. of this discussion is 
simply to show that the Illinois Survey has yielded no vidence 


of interference. It has icing evidence (slso found 
other states,especially 1 wa) that. good quail country and good pheas 
country are two different things ,with only a narrow overla Zone 
@ end hence the pheasant is ‘by no means.to be regarded 4s & substitut 
quail. 
{ that tthe pheasant has adapted 








