adapted to neighborhood than to individual initiative. Posting and policing 
is obviously easier for a large area than a small onee Techincal service 
can be rendered better to a group than an individual. 
The proposed vocational training need not all be given in one lump e 
If the agricultural college has a demonstration area (organized under the 
present system of fellowships) the neighborhood leaders could be invited to 
come in at any time to see the results of some new experiment of consider 
some new idea. There would be an excellent chance to eradually build up in 
these neighborhood leaders a certain breadth of view, a certain ethical stan- 
dard, and a sound attitude toward biological problems now too often la cking 
in managers of shooting right not only in this country, but also in Europe. 
In states or parts of states where game farming is important these 
neighborhood leaders might*also be offered special instruction at the 
CGlinto school, 
The general principle here proposed would work for any kind of game, 
put quail is the obvious choice for making a start, 
The men trained un Institute fellowships would fall naturally into 
the role of technical advisors in the extension service, travelling from 
one neighborhood group to another and helping solve their special problems, 
Obviously these neighborhood groups would offer valuable proving grounds for 
testing the workability of conclusions reached through research. 
It stukes me that conerete constructive projects proving that an 
abundance of game can be raised on posted farms actually put under manage~ 
ment are a much more effective means of combating the almost universal pre- 
judice against paid shooting, than are abstract arguments to the effect that 
farms must be posted if we are to conserve any gamle. The argument in 
Se BOP me 

