98 
XL toryanca 2.4 angustus, Verco. SE Gp 
fef.—Antea, p. 86. 
Hab.—St. Vincent Gulf; dredged deep water, 2 alive, 1 dead 
(J. C. Verco). 
3. Q. Paivee, Crosse. aac 
Ref.—Jour. de Conch., Third Series, vol., XII., 1864, p. 278, 
pl. xi., fig. 7. 
Type specimen collected at low tide under stones on Yorke’s 
Peninsula, 8.A. 
Tryon classes it as a Urosalpinz, and regards Pusus Hanley?, 
Angas, as ancelate form (Man. of Conch., vol. IT., p. 155). But 
it is not a Urosalpinx, and Fusus Hanleyi, Angas, is a different 
shell altogether. He says also ‘it is not readily distinguished 
from U. Floridana, Conrad. Von Martens considers Musus corti- 
catus, Hutton, a synonym of U. Paiva,” loc. cit. if 
_ Hab.—Dredged alive and dead, deep water St. Vincent Gulf 
(J. C. Verco), Encounter Bay (D. J. Adcock). 
Gerrard, Ky, reeurvits, Koch (Fusus). oD 
Ref.—Abbild. und Beschreib., Conch. Philippi, vol. IT., p. 119, 
tab. 3, fig. 6. 
This shell was separated as a species distinct from 7. Paiva, 
by Mr. W. T. Bednall, who was proposing to describe it as new, 
when its identity with the usus recurvus of Koch, of unknown 
habitat, was recognised. 
Hab.—St. Vincent Gulf, Salt Creek (W. Z. Bednall), Sema- 
phore, alive (D. J. Adcock). 
Meta 5.-& Assisi, 7en.- Woods. Sof RR 
Ref.—Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasmania, 1876, p. 132. 
Type specimens, N. Coast, Tasmania (W. 2. Petterd). 
Tryon classes it as a Urosalping, and “ doubts: its distinctness 
from U. Paive, Crosse. It is probably a young shell,” Man. of 
Conch., vol. IT., p. 155. 
But it is not a Urosalpina, for its operculum is ovate, with an 
apical nucleus. It is quite distinct from 7. Pave ; as T. Woods 
says, “it is easily distinguished by its long canal, and peculiar 
lamellose striations” (longitudinal, J. C. V.). : 
It is nota young shell. Counting the number of its whorls, 
it is often older than 7’. Paive, and when full grown retains the 
same characters. 
Tt has been placed in Mr. Adcock’s list as a Peristernia ; but 
the absence of columellar plications, and the muricoid, and not 
fasciolarioid radula, which is figured on pl. iii., fig. 2, remove it 
from that genus. 

