CORRELATION OF MAYA AND CHRISTIAN CHRONOLOGY. 497. 
Table showing the correlation of the Maya and the Christian years. 
| 
Christian Maya Christian Maya Christian Maya 



year. year. Source. year. year. Source. year. year, Source 
Peo cee. 10 Kan... $eiGy ace 3 7 Cauac} No. 1. Servite. : Pie eine pay 
PeAGine <1,4 11 Muluc} No. 2. PUG Y. 8 Kan... Ee EE 5 Cauac. 
Ny Janae iss. HC 4 ac ioe 9 Muluc| No. 16. jay AY sal oe 6) Kans. 
TeOR nt. 13 Cauac} No. 13. Feel inca TO. 1X. vas, ye ae 7 Muluc. 
iB Le eo, ee te Nanie- ify Arte 11 Cauac. yds vos woe hl ged re 
“Ot eee 2 Muluc. 5563 "ta ca: Kany vce kare g Cauac. 
CPE eens mh ee 15845 es 13 Muluc {C7 7-4 eS 10 Kan 
OE pee 4 Cauac} No. 6. Ni ee eRe 1576. a oe 11 Muluc. 
TNs ED 5 Kan... it pee 2 Cauac. £S7G=. ok Cpa ae 
eRthi te... 6 Muluc meres 2 Kaoc PEGO* uur 13 Cauac 
ee chaict 3 LS See, FES Te eke 4 Muluc. FEBL OS ims 1 Kan... 
ERtOr sc, » 8 Cauac PEG Ue ack Ske ee Cc? See 2 Muluc 
Hesea.st .; 9 Kan... REQ: te. 6 Cauac. ieGe.t5. tt AA eat 
a 10 Muluc. EEGL oastist 7 Kan... A) See 4 Cauac. 
i) ae Fils anes, PEGs as ns 8 Muluc. FEBS. 5 t6. 5 Kan... 
BORO vin s ss 12 Cauac. YEOS auto e ng Cae T500 os ha 6 Muluc. 
‘(ot eee 13 Kan. .| No. 8. 166400 ue. 10 Cauac. E87 2. Lope aon 
Bee aes ii. 1 Muluc. Veneta: 11 Kan... chet ae 8 Cauac. 
Tee MAR pe) N08, 9, 0G.1) PSG0%. 5 a. 12 Muluc. a ae Go Kane. 
BRaAY Sess 3 Cauac| Nos.14,15.|| 1567...... Pets. ara we 10 Muluc. 
$8455 i. 4 Kan... ES6SLOS A 1 Cauac. 191% in. inhi 
1) 5 Muluc. BGG bites. 2 Kan... EEGS, tu. cs 12 Cauac. 
BRT 5 cre ae Sere einen ee 3 Muluc. Cot eee 13 Kan. .| Nos.11,12. 

This leaves Nos. 3, 4, and 5 (the first two probably copies of the same original), 
all of which agree with each other that 4 Kan fell in 1536, but disagree with every- 
thing else. It will be remembered that it was these same three entries which fixed 
the year 1536 as occurring in the fourteenth tun of Katun 13 Ahau, thereby dis- 
agreeing with all the other sources and even contradicting other entries of their own 
by that statement. 
It is obvious, therefore, that these three passages are radically wrong; not only 
do they give a tun correlation at variance with all the other sources and even with 
themselves elsewhere, but also the year-bearer they associate with 1536 disagrees 
with those in the other two systems for this year, and even with the one in the purely 
schematic 52-year series in No. 17. 
Because of their isolation and consistent non-conformity with everything else, 
including even other passages in the chronicles where they occur, the writer be- 
lieves this passage in III, IV, and 1X must have the two following points stricken 
from it: 
(1) That 1536 fell in the fourteenth tun of Katun 13 Ahau. 
(2) That 4 Kan was the year-bearer for the year beginning in July 1536. 
And be accepted only as regards the two more general points: 
(1) That Napot Xiu died in a Katun 13 Ahau. 
(2) That this event took place in 1536. 

1No. 13, as carried backward 208 years, begins a series of 53 consecutive years here: 1528-1580 inclusive. 
2No. 6 begins a series of 13 consecutive years here: 1532 to 1544 inclusive. 
3No. 6 ends with this year, and Nos. 14 and 15 as carried backward 208 years, begin series of 48 and 25 con- 
secutive years respectively with this year: No. 14, 1544-1591 inclusive, and No. 15, 1544-1568 inclusive. 
4No. 16, as carried backward 208 years, begins a series of 17 consecutive years here: 1550-1566 inclusive. 
5This may be Landa’s specimen year 12 Kan. 
6No. 16, as carried backward 208 years, ends with this year. 
™No. 15, as carried backward 208 years, ends with this year. 
8No. 13, as carried backward 208 years, ends with this year. 
9No. 14, as carried backward 208 years, ends with this year. 
