THE APOLLO TYPE. 101 
in the original form. ‘This improvement is seen in the treatment of the 
hair, in the modeling of the face and body, and in the proportions of the 
statues. In ahead of a statue from Mount Ptoion'—which is broken 
off at the neck—we seem to see the sculptor in wood making his first 
attempt instone. Inthe archaic example from Thera? (Fig. 9) the arms 
hang straight down close to the sides, as in the statue of Arrhachion, 
being detached only slightly from the body at the elbows, showing that 
the artist was afraid that they might 
break off. In other examples, as in the 
one from Orchomenos? (Fig. 10) and one 
from Mount Ptoion‘ (Fig. 11), the space 
between the arms and the body has be- 
come larger, while in the example from 
Melos® (Fig. 12) only the hands are glued 
to the thighs. In the “Apollo” found 
at Tenea in 1846, and now in Munich® 
(Pl. 8A), the arms are free, but the hands 
are held fast to the body by the reten- 
tion of small marble bridges between 
them and the thighs. The final step 
1Stais, Marbres et Bronzes, pp. 11-12 and fig.; B.C. #7., 
X, 1886, Pl. V (two views) and pp. 98 f. (Holleaux); 
Collignon, I, p. 117, fig. 58; Deonna, op .cit., p. 161, no. 35; 
Richardson, p. 44, fig.12. It is inthe National Museum 
at Athens, where most of the “‘Apollos”’ are to be found. 
The sanctuary of Apollo Ptoios on Mount Ptoion, 
Beeotia, is mentioned by P., IX, 23.6, Hdt., VIII, 135, 
and other writers. 
2In Athens: Kabbadias, no. 8; Stais, Marbres et 
Bronzes, p. 10; Deonna, p. 227, no. 129; 4. M., III, 
1878, Pl. VIII; Collignon, I, p. 132, fig. 66; Gardner, 
oes), ne. 16; Richardson,.p. 39, fig. 5; .B. B., 
mo.77c; von Mach, 12; Reinach, Ré., II, 1, 76, 10; Fic. 9.— Statue of so-called 
F. W., 14; Springer-Michaelis, p. 172, fig. 336; Perrot- Apollo of Thera. National 
Chipiez, VIII, p. 319, fig. 133. Museum, Athens. 
3K abbadias, no. 9; Stais, Marbres et Bronzes, pp. 9-10 
(1.27 m. high); Annali, XX XIII, 1861, pp. 79 f. and Pl. E; Deonna, oP. cit., p. 148, no. 26; B. C. H., 
V, 1881, Pl. IV, and pp. 319 f.; Collignon, I, p. 114, fig. 56; Overbeck, I, fig. 14; Gardner, 
Hbk., p. 166, fig. 29; Richardson, p. 40, fig. 8; B. B., 77A; von Mach, 11 b; Perrot-Chipiez, 
VIII, p. 509, fig. 260; F. W., 43; Reinach, Rép., II, 1, 76, 11. 
4Kabbadias, no. 10;Stais, Marbres et Bronzes, p.8 (1.30 meters high); Deonna, p. 153, no. 28; B. 
C. H., X, 1886, Pl. IV, and p. 66 (Holleaux); Collignon, I, p. 196, fig. 92; von Mach, 15a (left); 
Gardner, Hbk., p. 168, fig. 30; B. B., 12 (left); Reinach, Rép., II, 1, 76, 7. In another found at 
Mount Ptoion in 1903, the left arm is almost entirely broken away: B. C. H., XXXI, 1907, 
Pl. XX. 
5Stais, Marbres et Bronzes, p. 10, no. 1558; Deonna, p. 217, no. 114, B. C. H., XVI, 1892, Pl. 
XVI (two views) and pp. 560 f. (Holleaux); von Mach, no. 13; Perrot-Chipiez, VIII, p. 321, 
fig. 134; Gardner, Hbdk., p. 132, fig. 17; Richardson, p. 39, fig. 6; Reinach, Rép., II, 1, 76, 1. 
 6Furtw.-Wolters, Beschreib. d. Glypt.,2? pp. 49 f., no. 47; Gardner, Hbk., p. 158, fig. 26; 
Gardiner, p. 87, fig. 7; Richardson, p. 40, fig. 7; B. B., no. I; Bulle, 37 (right); von Mach, 14; 
Furtw.-Urlichs, Denkm., Pl. I, pp. 3 f; Mon. d. I., IV, 1847, Pl. XLIV; Baum., I, fig. 340; 
Collignon, I, p. 202, fig. 96; Springer-Michaelis, p. 174, fig. 338; Perrot-Chipiez, VIII, p. 401, 
figs. 187, 188; F. W., 49; Reinach, Rép., II, 1, 76, 2. It is 1.53 meters high (Bulle). 

