180 VICTOR STATUES REPRESENTED IN MOTION. 
boxer in the Louvre known as Pollux (Fig. 58),' the athlete of the Boboli 
Gardens in Florence formerly called Harmodios by Benndorf,’ and the 
statue of an athlete of later style in Lansdowne House, London.’ Other 
scholars have also connected the Pe- 
rinthos head with Pythagoras.4 Her- 
mann brought it into relation with the 
bust in the Riccardi Palace in Florence, 
which, despite its swollen ears, we have 
already classed as representing a hero 
and not an athlete, because of the 
garment thrown over the _ shoulder.’ 
Furtwaengler tried to show that this 
bust was Myronian in style, classing it 
and the head of an athlete in Ince Blun- 
dell Hall, Lancashire, England,® along 
with that of the earlier Diskobolos, ex- 
plaining the acknowledged differences 
in the three by Pliny’s statement that 
Myron primus multiplicasse veritatem i 
: 
Ce Se ean fae Big. 33 ea eee 
> : , from Perinthos. Albertinum, 
gether with two others in the Jakobsen __ Dresden. 
collection in Copenhagen,’ the head of 
the so-called Pollux of the Louvre, a bearded head in Petrograd,% and 

1Mon. d. I., X; 1874-78, Pl. II (head); Annali, XLVI, 1874, Pl. L. Arndt, La Glypt. Ny-Carls- 
berg, p. 62, doubts if the head belongs to the torso. 
*Duetschke, II, no. 77 (=one of two statues); Mon. d. I., VIII, 1864-68, Pl. XLVI, 6-8, and 
Annali, XX XIX, 1867, pp. 304 f. (Benndorf); Arndt-Amelung, nos. 96-98; cf. 4. Z., XXVII, 
1869, pp. 106 f. and Pl. 24, 2 (Benndorf, Tyrannicides on a Panathenaic amphora in the British 
Museum, etc.), and XXXII, 1875, pp. 163 f. (Duetschke, group of two statues); Reinach, Rép. 
II, 2, 541, 6. Both Duetschke (4. Z.,/. c.) and Furtwaengler (Berl. Philol. Wochenschr., VIII, 
1888, p. 1448) have shown that it represents an athlete. 
’Michaelis, p. 446, no. 36; Clarac, V, 856, 2180. Furtwaengler believes the statue later in 
style than the Louvre boxer. 
4E. g., P. Hermann, op. cit., pp. 332-3; Arndt, text to B. B., no. 542. 
°B. B., no. 361; Amelung, Fuehrer, 210; Duetschke, II, 163; Furtw., Mp., pp. 165 f. and fig. 66 
(two views); Mw., pp. 339 f. and Pl. XVII (from a cast); F. W., 458. For three replicas of the 
Riccardi type, see Arndt, text to B. B., 542. Furtwaengler believed this head a prototype of 
the Diomedes of Kresilas known to us from copies in Munich (Pl. XXI): Mw., pp. 311 f. and 
Pls. XII, XIII; Mp., pp. 146f. and figs. 60 (body), and 61 (head, two views); B. B., 128; Brunn, Sitzd. 
Muen. Akad., 1892, pp. 651 f.; in Paris: Froehner, Notice, no. 128; Clarac, 314, 1438; and 
elsewhere. Seesupra p. 169. 
®Michaelis, p. 367, no. 152; Mp., p. 172, fig. 71; Mw., p. 347, fig. 44; 4. Z., XX XI, 1874, Pl. III; 
F. W., 459. Kekulé was the first to class it as Myronian: Ueber d. Kopf des Praxitel. Hermes, 
p. 12, 1 (quoted by F. W.,/.c.). Graef curiously found it Pheidian: Aus d. Anomia, p. 69, 63. 
"H. N., XXXIV, 58; cf. Mp., p. 173. 
‘La Glypt. Ny-Carlsberg, Pl. XXXVI and p. 60; the other, unpublished, is mentioned ibid. He 
also adds the cast of a lost original statue of a boxer in the Royal Academy of Fine Arts in Copen- 
hagen, whose head belongs stylistically to the same series: ibid., pp. 60-61, and figs. 30 (head), 
31-32 (body). If the head and body belong together it is the only statuary type of the group. 
*Kieseritzky, Kat. d. Ermitage,1901, p. 27, no. 68; Furtw., Mp>., p. 177, fig. 74; Mw., p. 353 fig. 46 
(two views). 
