390 ANIMAL REMAINS FROM THE EXCAVATIONS AT ANAU. 
Table of dimensions (in millimeters). 


Subfossil |Subfossil 
East 
La Téne} West |a.7 Prze- Tur- 
North | ‘horse, | Siberian Siberian | walski | kestan 
; pea: from | Tartaria Hi horse, | horse, 
Upper jaw. nau, | Hosto- | horse, Paige after } after 
+12 f after _|ar rv 
mitz, after i epiears Tscher- | T'scher 
feet. Mus. | Tscher- ki ski. ski. 
Teplitz.| ski. ce 



Width of face at 
orbita maxillaris. 168 162 169 179 193.5 182 
Width of face at 
diastema _ be- 
tween premolar 

4and molarir... 118 5 4 TDS 9) 22400 gees 
Width of face be- | 
fore premolar 2. 58 64 59 69 | 68 
Width of face be- | 
tween molars I / 
ands ewe 119 | 108 118 r20° | 
Length of dental | 
series of upper 
jaw from premo- 






















lar 2 to molar 3. 174 169 164 T7255 aes 167 | 159 183 165 165.5 
= SS = — = = | 
Equus 
/ lus. fo 
Equus caballus hemné-w lt Edie nae 
Lower jaw and dental series. — | ee sate onager 
Ljachow.| Ireland. Teree | kiang 
Width of lower jaw between alveoli | 
of premolariottec 14, eee ae 36 Pee 38.3 38 4I 44 40.5 41 
Length of diastemas2... aoe | go (?) 97 97 80 86 87 7308 
Smallest part before premolar 2....... ar | hens 47 39.5 39 44 37 44 
= (leapt, 225. yee ee 2 Ls Ae tae a3 30 30-5) 315 30 23 
Ereta lat Awidth,< 4, sck sy eaeurne 15 sae 15.5 16 15 | 16.5 £6 13 
Slength 2s 397 eae 27 | 26 30 28 27.3 | 28 28 27.5 
Premolar 3 ( Width: wi sooo hare eB co.5 20 18 | 16 T7573) ete 18 16.5 
Nlength 2.0 cae anes Sivek z Phe El eg) 26 he Bay 26.5 26 
Premolac 4.7 wid ieee a aN aah eR Rela Se 18 | 317-5 | 18 17 
(lengthier cere e 23 ed 2 HARES hee 24 25 
Mola width: oa eee 16> Wty) ERB. See 16 15 3 
, slength. cy wane saat oh 24 2738 2: 2555 sume 25 26.5 
Molar 2 (widtharn cece eet eee 14 17 15 16 16 15 15 
SCAPULA. 
The one almost perfectly preserved specimen of the scapula belongs also, 
as is shown by the comparative dimensions, to a horse of medium size. The slen- 
derness of the bones, a characteristic especially typical of the Anau horse, is here 
very perceptible. No further peculiarities are noticeable in the structure of the 
bones. 
HUMERUS. 
None of the bones permit a full measurement of the length of the humerus. 
Generally speaking, they were only distal pieces, the measurements of seven 
of which we have given in the table on p. 392. ‘The few measurements of width 
here given approach nearest to those of Equus przewalskii and Equus hemionus. 

