400 THE HORSE OF ANAU IN ITS VARIOUS RELATIONS. 
Frank states chiefly that the plication of the enamel-margin in the upper 
molars of the ass is less complex than in the Oriental horse, and that the so-called 
spur is here wholly wanting. He considers the best characteristic to be the fact 
that the distance from the anterior margin of the foramen occipitale to the median 
point of the vomer incision is shorter in the ass than the distance from the same 
point on the vomer to the end of the palatine suture. In the horse this dimension 
is much greater. 
Nehring also agrees with Frank as to the great value of this characteristic. 
Dugeés calls attention to the greater convexity of the forehead of the ass. 
According to him the face is shorter in comparison with the horse, and the orbits 
triangular. A perpendicular to the plane of support falls far behind the condyli 
of the occiput. The free part of the nasalia reaches to the posterior edge of the 
corpus maxillare and is therefore very long in the ass; then the spur is wanting 
on the teeth. In the horse, on the other hand, according to him, the forehead 
is flat, the orbits round and the occipital line touches the condyli. The free part 
of the nasalia does not reach to the middle of the incisive edge. The “‘spur’’ is 
characteristic of the teeth. 
Monfalet gives nothing on the characteristics of the face, but only on those 
of the brain-skull. 
The most accurate work, especially as regards dentition, is that of X. Lesbre. 
He is the first to distinguish between the teeth of the adult animal and of the 
young. He finds (p. 60) that in the horse, at the age of ten months, the ‘“‘spur,’’ 
which he calls “pli cabalin,”’ is already clearly developed. In the young ass this 
is always wanting. 
Lesbre confirms a shortening of the teeth of the adult ass through a kind 
of atrophy of the posterior pillar, but he considers the disposition of the enamel 
plications moreimportant. (1) In the upper molars the internal lobule is less devel- 
oped in the ass than in the horse, all proportions remaining the same; it is, in the 
first place, shorter towards the rear, so that its base stands median or almost 
median, and not, as in the horse, on the forward part of the tooth. In the first 
molar the plication is round in both animals, only in the ass it is less obliquely 
inclined toward the back than in the horse. (2) The exterior sides of the tooth 
seen from the grinding surface are narrow and simple in the ass, broad and com- 
pressed in the middle in the horse, especially the premolars. (3) The ‘‘spur”’ 
or pli cabalin is wanting in the ass at all ages, or is very inconspicuous, while 
in the horse it is often double, and disappears only at an advanced age, and earlier 
in the molars than in the premolars. (4) The crescentic islands are simpler in 
the ass than in the horse, less plicated and complex, but they often vary. (5) The 
outer channels are not so deep in the ass as in the horse. On the molars of 
the lower jaw Lesbre finds that the 8 formed by plications 1 and 2, has both of its 
loops generally rownd in the ass, and usually somewhat flattened and angular in the 
horse. In the ass both the loops of the 8 are equally large; in the horse the for- 
ward one is longer than the posterior, and they are separated by a sharp angle 
instead of by a curve. An exception is the first premolar, in which the posterior 
