446 N. C. AGR. EXP. STA. BUL. 239 
There has been no valid type-species selection for Juliaca Melichar, to date. 
The nominal species listed by Evans (1947a:162) as type-species is a nomen 
nudum. It is the species described below as 7. melichart, n. sp. I have selected 
Microgoniella naevula Melichar because two of the four species originally in- 
cluded by Melichar in his Microgoniella subgenus Microscita fit Juliaca in the 
sense of Evans and Melichar. Under Article 13 section (b) of the International 
Rules, Microscita Melichar is not an available name regardless of subsequent 
actions. 
My interpretation of Microgoniella bilineata Melichar is based on a specimen 
from Callanga, Peru, from MMB, determined by Melichar. The male 
genitalia are like Juliaca huasima, n. sp. 
The male lectotype of Tettigoniella scapula Jacobi has been dissected (fig. 
370) and found to be the same as the male lectotype of Tettigonia carbuncula 
Breddin, which was also dissected. 
I have seen a single male of Microgoniella cinctella Melichar from MMB, 
possibly the only specimen studied by Melichar. The genitalia had been 
prepared and placed in separate pieces in a dry glass vial, and were very dif- 
ficult to handle. Because the pygofer and plates are close to Juliaca simoni, n. 
sp., and because the anterior dorsum is very near 7. Ahuasima, n. sp., I have 
placed it in uliaca but have not designated the specimen lectotype in the hope 
that there may be more (and better) specimens eligible. 
I have seen the female lectotype of Tettigonia collata Fowler (fig. 388). 
Medler placed this species in Erythrogonia Melichar, but his illustration does 
not fit the lectotype, although I think the illustration also belongs in Juliaca, 
perhaps chapini, n. sp., below. 
I have seen a single male of Microgoniella dorsigutta Melichar from MMB. 
The male genitalia are like chapint. 
M. dorstsignata Melichar is placed in Juliaca on the basis of an examination 
of the lectotype and one additional female. 
I have seen only the female lectotype of Cardioscarta homalina Melichar. It is 
placed in juliaca because of the form and of color pattern of the forewings, 
both suggesting a relationship to a variety of 7. pergrata (Melichar) from 
Colombia. 
The present interpretation of Tettigonia lepida Signoret is based on a study of 
the lectotype which agrees with figure 376, but with the paraphyses sym- 
metrical. Tettigoniella espriella Distant is placed in synonymy under /epida as a 
result of the similarity of the Distant holotype to a sketch of the anterior dor- 
sum of a specimen from Itaituba, Brazil. Melichar first synonymized these 
names in 1951. 
A male from the type-series of Cicadella limboclavula Osborn is presently 
selected as lectotype. It bears labels: ‘““Chulumani/Bolivia, Dec. 9, ’98” and 
‘Holotype/Cicadella/limboclavula/Osborn” and ‘‘90203” and ‘‘Herbert/Os- 
born/Collection” and “Cicadella/limboclavula/Osb.”. The specimen is in 
OSU. I have studied the male lectotype of Microgoniella obstinatula Melichar. 
The lectotype of Mucrogoniella naevula has been studied (fig. 363). 
I have seen three specimens of Microgoniella ornatula Melichar, loaned by 
MMB. I select a male as lectotype. It bears labels: ‘‘Alto de las/cruces” and 
