700 N. C. AGR. EXP. STA. BUL. 239 
shown in figure 571, are like those of S. sagata (Signoret) (fig. 582h) except 
that the edges are not serrate. 
Tettigonia cwilis Fowler is identified here on the basis of a study of the lecto- 
type. Its markings are not like those of most of the other species, but the 
structural characters agree, including the ovipositor. The present interpre- 
tation of Tettigonia compta Fowler is based on a study of the male lectotype, the 
genitalia of which are very similar to the specimen illustrated here (fig. 566) 
from El Salvador. The present interpretation of 7. flaccida Fowler rests on a 
comparison of the female lectotype with figure 566a. My interpretation of 
Entogonia convergens Melichar is based on a male cotype in ZIMH. This speci- 
men, one of 15 “‘cotypes”’ in the collection in Hamburg, is here designated 
lectotype. The specimen bears labels: “‘Costa Rica/San Jose 1911-1912” and 
‘“H. Schmidt leg./vend. 6.3.1913”. The genitalia of this specimen were also 
very close to those of the specimen from El Salvador illustrated here. 
My interpretation of Entogonia conferta Melichar is based on a male “‘cotype”’ 
of this species in ZIMH. This specimen is here designated lectotype. It bears 
labels: ““Costa Rica/S. Jose 5.8.1910” and ‘SH. Schmidt leg./vend. 1.11.1910” 
and ‘“‘Entogonia/conferta m./L. Melichar det. 1922”, and a longhand de- 
termination label. A second “‘cotype”’ in the Hamburg collection had the head 
missing. The genitalia of the lectotype are as the specimen illustrated here 
(fig. 584) from Panama. 
I have seen only the holotype of Entogonia inexpectata Metcalf and Bruner, a 
specimen in NCS without abdomen. 
I have seen only the holotype of Neokolla mesolinea DeLong and Currie (fig. 
580). The male genital characters, not illustrated here, are all very similar to 
the illustrations of S. recta (Fowler) (fig. 569) (but the plates extend 
posteriorly as far as the pygofer apex, and there is no ventral group of micro- 
setae on the pygofer), except the style and connective which are very close to 
the illustration of S. conferta (Melichar) (fig. 584). 
The type material of the Thomas Say collection was destroyed. I have in- 
terpreted Stbovia occatoria (Say) in the light of specimens from eastern U.S.A. 
(Indiana was the type-locality). There is only one species known in eastern 
U.S.A. 
I have seen only the female lectotype of Ceratogonia optabilis Melichar (fig. 
591). It was not at hand when the key was written. The species is near Szbovia 
prodigiosa (Melichar) and S. chanchama, n. sp. 
Specimens of S. pileata (Fowler) have a red-margined crown like specimens 
of the new genera Coronigoniella, Stephanolla, and Coronigonalia, but the female 
genitalia are very close to Sibovia species (valvulae II very near S. praevia, and 
abdominal VII not produced), and the male genitalia are close to S. sagata 
(Signoret). 
A specimen in MMB labeled “‘typus”’ from Marcapata, Peru and bearing 
Melichar’s determination label, is the basis of Sibovia praevia (Melichar), as 
treated here. 
I have identified Ceratogonia prodigiosa Melichar in the sense of the female 
lectotype and a male labeled “‘paralectotypus” from MMB. 
