
+ 
COMPARATIVE STUDIES WITH COVERED MILK PAILS 97 





Table 23. 
North Pail with and without strainer (two thicknesses of fine cheese 
cloth). 
Date Time Kind of pail Pee Bocce Sree 
APE Sih: A. M. | With strainer 215 20 92 
piceale. Av7M:? Without strainer 170 30 0 
Reet 7 ack PM, With strainer 646 96 37 
ee ae Pa Without strainer 825 208 4 
AS Pb Sb A. M. With strainer 1,245 390 120 
Wee OO A. M. Without strainer 2,460 430 104 
Tee Ok PSM: With strainer 1,100 125 60 
Smee ee LEASE Without strainer 2,050 70 608 
ee es A. M. With strainer 938 350 54 
ee ie A. M. Without strainer | 1,654 200) «| 896 
Boake +c hee 1a") With strainer 696 oO 200 
Be 9 20%, Pe: Without strainer 1,258 410 Zk 
Stare A. M. With strainer 1,350 310 207 
ae oUse A. M. Without strainer 900 259 13 
ais 10 Re REN. With strainer 1,606 263 44 
she PEM. Without strainer 15555 255 120 
Maye i2-: A. M. | With strainer 227 os 8 
ss ae A. M. Without strainer 140 40 0 
nf ave P. M. With strainer 950 292 15 
2 2. P. M. | Without strainer 730 142 25 
Average.. With strainer 890 180 85 
mer Verace.: Without strainer 1,160 200 150 









With strainer. 
Without strainer. 
Difference in favor of strainer. 

\ 
of the average number found in the milk drawn into the pail 
where the strainer cloth was not used. These results would 
indicate some advantage in the use of the strainer though it 
is not indicated in all of the experiments. This pail has one 
advantage over the Stadtmueller pail when used with the 
strainer in the fact that any dirt falling into the opening 
naturally works down toward the lower edge of the pail so 
that the succeeding streams of milk do not strike upon it 
breaking it to pieces and driving it through the strainer. It 
has the practical disadvantage, however, that the pail is not 
quite as easy to milk into as the Stadtmueller pail because the 
