snout 3 1/5 in head from upper jaw tip; eye 33; maxillary 
21/6; interorbital 3 1/8; rakers 8+20; opercular spot ap- 
parently feded? 
Following Mr, Nichols” we identify C. pisquetus Cuvier 
and C, caballus Gunther with the present species, Of the 
former we have an example 2407 mm, long (caudal damaged); 
without locality, which may also have been brought from Rio 
Janeiro? +t shows: Head 34; depth 3 1/5; D. I, VIII - I, 22; 
A. II @ I, 20; scales 457-44 in 1.1.3; snout 3% in head; eye 
4 1/10; maxillary 2 1/3; interorbital 4; rakers 12+ 23; ope» 
cular spot not obsolete. Ribeiro” gives the scutes for C. 
e@rysos as 47 to 50 and his figure shows them less than 50, 
ag Copeia, April 15, 1920, no. 8l, Pp. 29, 
Arch, Mus, Na, Rio Janeiro, vol. 17, 1915, p. 19. 
This is in perfect agreement with the larger example descrb- 
ed and figured by Fowler. ‘+ts scales are simple, cycloid, mud 
fine circuli about 54 to 60, Examples of C. crysos in the Academy 
from Rhode Island and New Jersey show 50 to 55 scutes in 1.1, 
end rakers 10 to 15726 to 28, 
Caranx caballus (Gtnther). fo 
y: 
Head @ S/S: depth 2: D. I, VII ~ I, 26; A. II - I 23; 
leteral line lateral line 
scales 50 42? in 24,3; curve of TG 1 3/5 in straight section; 
snout 4 in head; eye 3; maxillary 2 1/3; interorbitsl 44; rekers 
