This example agrees in most details with the original 
account of Glyphisodon imparipennis Vaillant and Sauvage, 
Their description varies, however, in giving 16 soft dorsal 
rays and scales on snout nearly extending to front edges, 
rerheps the most striking character its the statement that 
the second anal spine is longer than the soft rays. This 
is wrongly translated as “second dorsal spine as long as 
ij 2 .) 185 2 
soft rays by Jordan and Evermann » thus rendering the 
most salient specific character misleading. These writers 
further incorrectly give 2 scales above the lseteral line 
though Vaillant and Sauvage mention 3, 
te EE: SRNR EEE RE Ee RS 
185 
Bull, U.S.Fish Com., vol.23, pt. 1, 1903(1905), p.274, 
Abudefduf uniocellatus (Quoy and Gaimard). 
Head 5; Gepin &. 2/5; D. KITT, 123 A. II, ll: 16 tubes 
in upper arch of lateral line, and 8 pores in horizontal 
section; 3 sceles above lateral line to spinous dorsal 
origin, 2 above to soft dorsal origin, 10 below to spinous 
anal origin; 16 predorsal scales; snout 3 1/6 in head; eye 
2s; maxillary 33; interorbitel 3, 
Body elongately ovoid, compressed; caudal peduncle 
length about 7/8 its least depth, which hslf of head, 
Head width 2, Snout length about 3/4 its width, Eye ele- 
vated, close to upper profile, hind edge little behind 
