| Reth pee? of German Literaturex—Rural Economy, &c; 681 
book for 1803.” This gentleman was 
likewife one of the moft active members 
of the Botanical Society at Ratifbon, 
which fince the year 1802, has publifhed 
an ‘* Allgemeine Botanifche Bibliothek,” 
General Botanical-Library.—Scuaabder’s 
** Botanical Journai”’ is likewife preceed- 
ing without interruption. ; 
Towards the improvement of Zoo- 
LoGy, many excellent Contributions con- 
tinued to be fornifhed in WitpEMANN’s 
6* Archiv.’ DonnvorF Continued his 
**furopean Fauna ;” and SCURANK fi- 
nifhed his “ Bavarian Fauna.” Kocu, 
of Magdeburg, gave, in his ** Mikogra- 
phie,”’ Infiructions for preparing and ex. 
amining the moft interefting Micographi- 
cal Objects in the three Kingdoms of Na- 
ture; and Ficatret and Von Mout 
treated of a partictilar obje&t of micro- 
{copy in a collestion, with plates, of 
** Tepaoca Microfcopica aliaque minuta 
et generibus Argonauta et Nautilus.”’ 
Entomology in particular has been di- 
ligently cuinvated. FaBricius conti- 
nued to clafs and defcribe the infeéts ac- 
cording to his fyitem, founded upon the 
difference of the organs by which they 
take their food 3 and Panzer, of whofe 
work on the Infects of Germany a new 
edition is publifhing, gave us ‘Sym. 
bole Entomologice,”’ with plates. Some 
cultivators of Entomology furnifhed an 
“< Tiluftrative Text for the Drawings of the 
different Species of Flies, by ScuzLLEN- 
BERG.” ScumipT, of Halle, with the 
accuracy of an attentive obferver, gave us 
-€€ Verfuche iiber die Infekten ;”—or, Ef- 
fays on Infects, particu'arly on. the Ca. 
leopteras; in which he treats of their hy- 
bernation, their means of deferdiug them- 
felves againft their enemies, &c. Pos- 
seTr furnithed “ Beytrage zur Anatomie 
cder Infekten,"—Contributiens towatds 
the Anatomy of Infeéts. 
Of the Tranfaftions of the * Gefel- 
{chaft Naturfor(chender freunde “zu Bev- 
lin;*’—or, Berlin Society for the Tnveltiga- 
tion of Natural Hiftory, ‘there appeared a 
fowth volume, containing Differtutions 
on Attronomical and Meteorological Sub- 
jeéts, on Galvanifm, Mineralogy, Bota- 
hy, Zoology, and the Natural Hiitory of 
particular Diftrids. 
ECONOMY. 
In this department of fcience, there is 
likewile, trom year to year, an ‘increafe 
of pubucations of a general and mixed 
kind, in which rural economy in general, 
or with a view to particular diftri€ts, is 
treated of, Befides the continuation of 
‘feveral journals, a new one, which pro- 
MonTuty Mac. No, 117. 
mifes much interefting matter, was becun 
at Halle: it is entitled “* Landwirthe 
{chaftliche Zeitung.” HeERMBsTEDT, 
who has beén engaged in applying the 
lateft difcoveries in chemiftry to the im- 
provement of technology, opened a new’ 
‘© Archiv der Agriculturchemie,”—Ar- 
chive for Agricultural Chemiftry; and, 
whit Gawprcu clofed with the fourth 
volume bis ** Ueberficht der Ganzcn 
Landwirihichaft,”"——View .of the whole 
Science of Rural Economy, founded on 
thirty years’ experience ; and Pross, with 
the fixth, his ** Handbuch,’ &c.—or, 
Manual of Practical Hufbandry; Ficu-- 
TER, with other economical writers, con~ 
tinued the ** Deat{che Landwirihfchaft,”” 
—German Hufbandiry; and WeissEn- 
BRUCH his ** Ganze der Landeswirth- 
{chafr,”’—Compleie View of every Branch 
of Hufbandry ; Leopoup publifhed the 
fir volume of a work, entitled « Agri- 
cola,’ containing inftruétions relative to 
every part of agriculture; and befides 
Riem, who continued his “‘ Neue Samme 
lung okonomiicher Schriften,’”—-NewCol- 
letion of Economical Papers, feveral 
other economifts gave-us mifcellaneous 
Traéts, or fuch as related to the rural 
economy of particular diftricts. Thus, 
for inffance, KrreGeEr's ** Oekonomifche 
und Cameraliftiiche Abhandiujgen,”’— 
Economical and Financial Tra&s, con- 
tain, befides a Differtation on Roman 
Agiiculture, feveral papers on the relative 
importance of various branches of econc- 
my. 
BeNeken, and many othe:s, among 
whom we find the name of the Duke 
Freperic of ScHLEswiG HoLusTein 
Beck, the principles of Englifh hut- 
bandry are explained, and the adoption. 
thereot recommended to the German far- 
mers. 
Meyers; in his ** Nahere-Bemerkun- 
gen zur Ucberlicht der Landw. in der 
Wark Bra denburg,” &c.-— NoLpe- 
CHEN, in his **-Annalen der Landw. in 
Brandenburg,’? and Count.PoDEWILS, in 
the fourth volume uf his ** Wirth{chatts- 
erfahrungen auf feinen Gitern,’’ con- 
fined their views to the agricuiture of 
Brandenburg, and gave an account of the 
agricultural exoeriments that had been 
tried, and of improvements that had been 
or might be introduced in that par: of 
Germany. M. von BUGGENHAGEN gave 
his countrymen ‘* Beytrage zur Auf 
nahme der Landwirth{chattin Schwedifch 
Pommern,’’—Contributions towards the 
Improvement of Agriculture in Swedith 
Pemerania, which contaia indeed many 
aU ufefa 
in Pe es 
In works pubiithed by TuHagr, 
“ot 
* 
