126  BIBLIOGRAPHY    OF    NORTH    AMERICAN    GEOLOGY 
Foerste  (August  F. ) — Continued. 
2.  The  Niagara  group  along  the  western  side  of  the  Cincinnati  anticline. 
Abstract:  Science,  new  ser.,  vol.  13,  pp.  134-135,  1901. 
3.  The  Cincinnati  anticline  in  southern  Kentucky. 
Am.  Geol.,  vol.  30,  pp.  359-369,  1  pi.,  1902. 
Describes  the  relations  of  the  Devonian,  Silurian,  and  Ordovician  formations  along  the  Cin- 
cinnati anticline. 
4.  Bearing  of  the  Clinton  and  Osgood  formations  on  the  age  of  the  Cincinnati  anti- 
cline. 
Abstract:  Science,  new  ser.,  vol.  15,  p.  90,  1902;  Geol.  Soc.  Am.,  Bull.,  vol.  13,  pp.  531-532,  1903. 
5.  Use  of  the  terms  Linden  and  Clifton  limestones  in  Tennessee  geology. 
Abstract:  Science,  new  ser.,  vol.  15,  p.  90,  1902;  Geol.  Soc.  Am.,  Bull.,  vol.  13,  p.  531,  1903. 
6.  The  Cincinnati  group  in  western  Tennessee,  between  the  Tennessee  River  and  the 
Central  Basin. 
Jour.  Geol.,  vol.  11,  pp.  29-45,  1  fig.,  1903. 
Discusses  the  subdivisions  of  the  Cincinnati  group  in  Ohio,  names  and  describes  the  subdivi- 
sions in  Tennessee,  and  gives  localities  of  outcrops  and  notes  on  characteristic  fossils. 
7.  Silurian  and  Devonian  limestones  of  western  Tennessee. 
Jour.  Geol.,  vol.  11,  pp.  554-583,  6  figs.,  pp.  679-715,  4  figs.,  1903. 
Describes  character,  occurrence,  and  correlation  of  Silurian  strata  along  the  western  side  of 
the  Cincinnati  geanticline  in  southern  Indiana,  Kentucky,  and  northern  Tennessee,  and  of 
Silurian  and  Devonian  si  rata  in  the  Tennessee  River  Valley,  and  discusses  evidences  for  the 
age  of  the  Cincinnati  geanticline  and  gives  lists  of  fossils  with  brief  descriptions  of  some 
forms. 
8.  The  Richmond  Group  along  the  western  side  of  the  Cincinnati  anticline  in  Indi- 
ana and  Kentucky. 
Am.  Geol.,  vol.  81,  pp.  333-361,  3  pis.,  1903. 
Discusses  occurrence  and  lithologic.  stratigraphic,  and  fauna]  features  of  the  subdivisions  of 
the  Cincinnati  series,  the  decrease  in  thicknessof  the  Richmond  group  in  Indiana  and  Ken 
tucky,  and  conditions  prevailing  in  the  Cincinnati  region  in  Ordovician  times. 
9.  Variation  in  thickness  of  the  subdivisions  of  the- Ordovician  of  Indiana.     With 
notes  on  the  range  of  certain  fossils. 
Am.  Geol.,  vol.  34,  pp.  87-102,  1  pi.,  1904. 
10.  The  Ordovician-Silurian  contact  in  the  Ripley  Island  area  of  southern  Indiana, 
with  notes  on  the  age  of  the  Cincinnati  geanticline. 
Am.  Jour.  ScL,  4th  ser.,  vol.  18,  pp.  321-342,  2  pis.  (maps),  1904. 
Discusses  the  stratigraphic  evidence  for  the  time  of  formation  of  the  Cincinnati  geanticline, 
the  occurrence,  character,  and  relations  of  Ordovician  and  Silurian  formations  in  Ohio, 
Didiana,  and  Kentucky,  and  gives  observations  upon  the  stratigraphic  position  of  various 
fossils,  the  relationships  of  Silurian  faunas  of  Indiana  with  those  of  New  York,  and  lists  of 
Niagara  fossils  of  Indiana. 
11.  Description  of  the  rocks  formed  in  the  different  geological  periods  in  Indiana: 
Ordovician  and  Silurian. 
Ind.,  Dept.  Geol.  &  Nat.  Res.,  28th  Ann.  Rept.,  pp.  21-39,  1904. 
12.  The  classification  of  the  Ordovician  rocks  of  Ohio  and  Indiana. 
Science,  new  ser.,  vol.  22,  pp.  149-152,  1905. 
13.  Notes  on  the  distribution  of  brachiopoda  in  the  Arnheim  and  Waynesville  beds. 
Am.  Geol.,  vol.  36,  pp.  244-250,  1905. 
Gives  notes  upon  the  geographic  distribution  and  geologic  horizons  of  certain  brachiopods 
of  the  Arnheim  and  Waynesville  beds  of  the  upper  Ordovician  beds  of  Ohio,  Indiana,  and 
Kentucky. 
Fontaine  (William  M.). 
1.  The  Jurassic  flora  of  Douglas  County,  Oreg. 
U.  S.  Geol.  Surv.,  Mon.,  vol.  48,  pp.  48-145,  1905. 
2.  Report  on  collections  from  plant-bearing  beds  in  the  Jurassic,  or  forming  the 
transition  to  the  lower  Cretaceous. 
U.  S.  Geol.  Surv.,  Mon.,  vol.  48,  pp.  148-179,  1905. 
