FOR    THE    YEARS    1901-1905,  INCLUSIVE. 
563 
Maryland— Continued. 
Copper  deposits  of  Appalachian  States, 
Weed,  17. 
Correlation  of  Coal  Measures  of  Mary- 
land, Clark  and  Martin,  5. 
Correlation  of  formations  and  mem- 
bers [of  the  Maryland  coal  district], 
Clark  and  Martin,  6. 
Correlation  of  Piedmont  formations, 
Mathews,  G. 
Correlation  of  the  Potomac  formation. 
Ward  (L.  P.),  3. 
Devonic  and  Ontario  formations  of 
Maryland,  Schuchert,  7. 
Distribution  and  character  of  Mary- 
land coal  beds,  Clark,  Martin,  and 
Rutledge,  1. 
Eocene  Arthropoda,  Ulrich,  1. 
Eocene  Bryozoa,  Ulrich,  2. 
Eocene  Ccelenterata,  Vaughan,   1. 
Eocene  deposits  of  Maryland,  Clark 
and  Martin,  1. 
Eocene  Echinodermata,  Clark  and  Mar- 
tin, 4. 
Eocene  Mollusca,  Clark  and  Martin.  2. 
Eocene  Molluscoidea  (Brachipoda ) . 
Clark  and  Martin,  3. 
Eocene  Pisces,  Eastman,   1. 
Eocene  Plantae,  Hollick,  3. 
Eocene  Protozoa,  Bagg,   1. 
Fault  phenomena  near  Glen  Echo,  Gil- 
bert, 25. 
First  discovery  of  fossil  seals  in  Amer- 
ica, True  (F.  W.),  2. 
Fossil  grasses  and  sedges.  Berry,  10. 
Geology  of  Coastal  Plain  formations, 
Shattuck,  5. 
Geology  of  crystalline  rocks  of  Cecil 
County.  Bascom.  1. 
Geology  of  Garrett  County,  Martin  (G. 
C),  1. 
Geology  of  Potomac  group  in  middle 
Atlantic  slope,  Clark  and  Bibbins,  1. 
Geology  of  the  Maryland  coal  district, 
Martin.  16, 
Gold  veins  near  Great  Falls.  Weed,  35. 
Lower  Carboniferous  of  Appalachian 
basin,  Stevenson   (J.  J.),  4. 
Maryland  Geological  Survey,  volume  4, 
Clark  (W.  B.),  1. 
Matawan  formation,  Clark   (W.  B.),  5. 
Mineral  resources  of  Cecil  County.  Ma- 
thews, 1. 
Mineral  resources  of  Garrett  County, 
Martin  (G.  C),  2. 
Miocene  deposits  of  Maryland,  Clark 
(W.  B.).  0. 
Miocene  deposits  of  Maryland,  Shat- 
tuck, 10. 
Miocene  formation  of  Maryland.  Shat- 
tuck, 6. 
Names  for  the  formations  of  the  Ohio 
Coal  Measures,  Prosser,  4. 
Niagara  period  near  Cumberland,  Uh- 
ler,  1. 
Occurrence  of  zoisite  and  thulite,  Bib- 
bins,  1. 
Maryland— Continued. 
Paleontology  of  the  Maryland  Miocene 
deposits,  Angiospermae,  Hollick,  10. 
Paleontology  of  the  Maryland  Miocene 
deposits,    Anthozoa,    Vaughan,    10. 
Paleontology  of  the  Maryland  Miocene 
deposits,     Brachiopoda,    Martin     (G. 
C),  6. 
Paleontology  of  the  Maryland  Miocene 
deposits,   Bryozoa,   Ulrich   and   Bass- 
ler,  4. 
Paleontology  of  the  Maryland  Miocene 
deposits,    Echinodermata,   Clark    (W. 
B.),  7. 
Paleontology  of  the  Maryland  Miocene 
deposits,  Foraminifera,  Bagg,  0. 
Paleontology  of  the  Maryland  Miocene 
deposits,  Hydrozoa,  Ulrich,  6. 
Paleontology  of  the  Maryland  Miocene 
deposits,   Malacostraca   and   Cirrepe- 
dia,  Martin  (G.  C),  4. 
Paleontology  of  the  Maryland  Miocene 
deposits,    Mammalia,   Aves,    Reptilia, 
Case,   9. 
Paleontology  of  the  Maryland  Miocene 
deposits,     Mollusca,     except     Pelecy- 
poda,  Martin  (G.  C),  5. 
Paleontology  of  the  Maryland  Miocene 
deposits,  Ostracoda,  Ulrich  and  Bass- 
ler,  3. 
Paleontology  of  the  Maryland  Miocene 
deposits,  Pelecypoda,  Glenn.  0. 
Paleontology  of  the  Maryland  Miocene 
deposits,  Pisces,  Eastman,  18. 
Paleontology  of  the  Maryland  Miocene 
deposits,  Radiolaria,  Martin   (G.  C), 
8. 
Paleontology  of  the  Maryland  Miocene 
deposits,        Thallophyta-Diatomacese, 
Boyer,  1. 
Paleontology  of  the  Maryland  Miocene 
deposits,  Vermes,  Martin   (G.  C),  7. 
Paleozoic  Appalachia,  Willis,  1. 
Paleozoic  formations  of  Allegany  Coun- 
ty, Prosser,  3. 
Paleozoic     ostracods     from     Maryland, 
Jones  (T.  R.),  4. 
Physical     features     of     Cecil     County, 
Shattuck,  3. 
Physiographic    features    of    Maryland, 
Abbe,  1. 
Physiography    of    Cecil    County,    Shat- 
tuck, 4. 
Physiography  of  Garrett  County,  Abbe, 
2_ 
Pleistocene  problem  in  Maryland,  Shat- 
tuck. 7. 
Potomac  group  in  Maryland,  Clark  and 
Bibbins,  2. 
Position  and  nature  of  Maryland  cy- 
cads,  Bibbins,  2. 
Recent  work  in  Piedmont  area  of  north- 
ern Maryland,  Mathews,  2. 
Relations  of  Maryland  Miocene,  Dall, 
14. 
