46 
Section ii, Monophylleza. 
monophyllum F.v.M. Fragm. i, 189 (1859). Figd. in. 
Fitzg. Austr. Orch. i B.FI. vi, 282 
cucumerinum Macleay in Bot. “Reg. Mise. 58 (1842) 
Figd. in Fitzg. Austr. Orch. i, Bot. Mag. t. 4619 B.FI. vi, 283 
Section iii, Rhizobium. 
pugioniforme’ A. Cunn. in Bot. Regi xxy, Misc, 33 
(1839) Be B.FI. vi, 284 
linguiforme Shumate | in Svensk. Vatensk. Ta Teall 247 
(1800) ae : aie “ ; sun Web INL, Sak, Best! 
Section iv, Strongyle. 
teretifolium R.Br. Prodr. 333 (1810), Bot. Mag. 
t. 4711 ue . B.FI. vi, 285 
var, Fairfaxii Benth, Fl. vi, 285 (D. Fairfaxii F.v.M. 
in Sydney Mail, Noy. 1872). 
striolatum G. Reichb, in Hamb, Gartenz, 313 (1857), 
Rodway, Fl. 'Tasm., plate facing.p. 184 ... B.Fl. vi, 285 
Beckleri F.v.M. Fragm. vy. 95 (1865), Bailey, Queensl. 
Fl. v, 1534 (1902). Figd. in Fitzg. Austr, Orch. i. 
Mortii F.v.M. Fragm. i, 214 (1859), Bailey, Queensl. Fl. 
v, 1534 (1902).* 
. Adelopetalum Fitzg. in Britt. Journ. Bot. xxix, 152 
(1891). 
bracteatum Fitzg. l.c. (Bulbophyllum bracteatum Bailey 
Bot. Bull. 4[1891]). Figd. in Fitzg. Austr. Orch. ii. 
Pe 
ote 
. Bulbophyllum Thou. Orchid. Afric. t. 95 et 108 
(1822). 
Shepherdi F.v.M. Fragm. viii, 40 (1862). Figd. in 
Fitzg. Austr. Orch. i ars - BFL vi, 288 
aurantiacum F.y.M. Fragm. iii, 39 (1862) oe ... BEI. vi, 288 
exiguum F.v.M, Fragm. ii, 72 Care Figd. in Fitzg. 
Austr. Orch, ii a5 isn me DpH) va 9.288 
minutissimum F.y,M. Fragm. xi, “53 (1878). . Figd. in 
Fitzg. Austr. Orch. ii. 
Elise F.v.M. Fragm. vi, 120 ae ere Fitzg. 
Austr. Orch. ii er act ve) J Bi Esyi;) 289 
Tribe ii, Vander, 
6. Te@niophyllum Blume Bijdr. 355 (1825). 
Muelleri Lindl. in Benth. Fl. Austr. yi, 291 Seen 
Bailey Queensl. Fl. v, t. 68.. B.FI. vi, 291 
7. Sarcochilus R.Br. Prodr. 332 (1810). 
divitiflorus F.v.M. in B.Fl. yi. 292 oene)} Figd, in 
Fitzg. Austr. Orch. i BiFI. vi, 292 
faleatus R.Br. Prodr, 332 (1810). ‘Figd.i in Pitas, Austr. 
Orch. i, Bot. Reg. t. 1832 . Mee bet vied 93 
. * Bentham seems to have mixed up D. Beckleri and D. Mortii in his description 
of D. Mortii and D. Bowmanii (B.FI. vi, 286), as pointed out by R. D. Fitzgerald 
(Austr. Orch. i, pl. 7) in his figure of the true D. Beckleri. Mr. F. M. Bailey’s above 
quoted descriptions of D. Beckleri and Moriii are apparently drawn up rasite fresh 
material and completely settle this question. 
