— 
1, 
bo 
—t 
39 / 
7, Family PHILYDRACEZ. 
Philydrum Banks in Gertn, de Fruct, i, 62 (1788) 
(Philhydrum)., 
lanuginosum Banks l.c., Bot. Mag. t. 783, Tllustr. 
Cook’s Voy. iii, t. 310 ies se Bix 
. Helmholtzia F.v.M. Fragm. v, 202 (1866). 
acorifolia F.y.M. l.c. ap ots a Se S50 
glaberrima* Car. in DC. Monogr. Phan. iii, 6 (1881) 
ao glaberrimum Hook. f. Bot. Mag. t. 
Series vii, Liliiflore. 
1. Family JUNCACEA. + 
. Luzula DO. Fi. France iii, 158 (1805). 
campestris DC. lc. 161 ... 
var. australasica (Steud.) Buch. in Osterr. Bot. 
Zeitschr. 216 (1898) (L. Oldfieldii Hook. f., L. 
Nove Cambriwe Gandoger). 
var. flaccida Buch. in Engler, Pflanzenreich iv, 36 
Juncacex, 92 (1906), 
yar, migrata Buch. in Osterr. Bot. Zeitschr., 242 
(1898) (var. bulbosa Buch. Monogr. Junc. in 
Engler, Bot. Jahrb. xii, 165, 1890). 
yar. multiflora Celak. Prodr. Fl. Bohmen, 85 (1869). 
Juncus 1. Gen, Plant. ed. i, 104 (1737). 
Sub-genus i, Junel polophylli. 
bufonius L. Spec. Plant. 328 (1753)... a gn 
revolutus R.Br. Prodr, 259 (1810) (J. Brownii F.v.M. 
1st Gen.. Rep. 19 (1853), F.v.M. Key Vict. Pl. 
t. 123) Poe Wel ahs ae eae oe 
plebeius R.Br. lc. (J. homalocaulis F.v.M. 1st Gen. 
Rep. 19, 1853), Ewart Pl. Vict. p. 23, t. 86 $ 
tenuis Willd. L. Spec. Plant. ii, 214 (1799), Proc. Linn. 
Soc. N.S.W. xxviii, 915 (1908). 
Sub-genus ii, Junei genuini. 
effusus L. Spec. Plant. ed. i, 326 (1753) (J. communis 
10}, WERYA)  oce ae ay A) a is 
pallidus R.Br. Prodr. 258 (1810) 450 oe Ae 
radula Buch. Krit. Verzeichn, aller Juncac, 38 (1880). 
Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. xxviii, 916 (1903). 
var. levior Buch. Monogr. Juncac. 241 (1890). 
BEL vu, 74 
B.FI. vii, 75 
B.Fl. vii, 123 
BF. 
B.FI, 
BFL. 
B.FI. 
B.FI. 
vii, 127 
vii, 128 
vii, 128 
vii, 128 
vii, 130 
* A doubtful New South Wales plant. It was admitted in ‘the Handbook of the 
Flora of New South Wales on the evidence of fragmentary doubtful material. 
+ In systematic arrangement and nomenclature we ‘have 
Monograph of the Juncacee in Engler’s Pflanzenreich iv, 
exception. Prof. Buchenau rejects J. revolutus R.Br. in favo 
followed Prof. Buchenau’s 
36 (1906), with a single 
ur of Mueller’s name, 
ecause R. Brown’s name ‘is an absolute misfit. This is a breach of the international 
les ‘of botanical nomenclature of 1906, in which we do not follow him. 
