26 
Tribe xi, Hordex. 
69. Lepturus: R.Br., Prodr. 207 (1810). 
incurvatus Trin. Fund. Agrost..123 (1820) ... ... BF. vii, 668 
cylindricus Trin. l.c. ae : “75 -.. BE. vii, 668 
70. Agropyrum Gaertn. Nov. Comm. Petrop. xiv, 539 
1770). : 
ies Beauv. Agrostogr. 102 (1812). Figd. Agric. 
Gaz. N.S.W. ii, 120 (1891) ae B.FIl. vii, 665 
velutinum Nees in Hook. Lond. Journ, Bot. ii, 417 
(1843). Figd. Agric. Gaz. N.S.W. x, 36 (1899)... B.Fl. vii, 665 
pectinatum Beauv. Agrostogr. 102 (1812). Figd. Agric. 
Gaz. N.S.W. viii, 77 (1897) = oh ere 
B.El. vii, 666 
2, Family CYPERACEA.* 
Sub-family i, Scirpo-Schenee. 
Tribe i, Cyperez. 
“1. Kyllingia Rottb. Deser. et Te. (1773). 
monocephala Rottb. Le. pl. 13, t. 4 (1773) (K. brevifolia 
Rottb. fide Kiikenthal) ... ae gas .. BEI vii, 251 
intermedia R.Br. Prodr. 219 (1810) (K. brevifolia 
Rottb. var. intermedia Kiikenthal — ... BF. vii, 251 
cylindrica Nees in Wight’s Contrib. to Bot. of India. 
~ 91 (1834). (KK. odorata Vahl. fide Kiikenthal) ... B.FI. vii, 252 
2. Cyperus UL. Syst. Nat. (1735): 
Sub-genus i, Pyereus. 
Style 2-cleft. Nut laterally compressed, i.c., one edge next the rhachis. 
flavescens L. Spec. Plant. 46 (1753) (P. flavescens 
Reichb.) es £. bes Bs Pa ae, ARSE yaa, DASh!) 
Eragrostis Vahl. Enum, Pl, ii, 322 (1806). Proc. Linn. 
Soc. N.S.W. xxv, 103 (1900) (P. sanguinolentus 
' Nees). er ay a are sa 2. Bell vuy 258 
polystachyus Rottb. Deser. et Ic. 39 t. 11 (17738) (P. 
polystachyus Beauy.) B.FI, vii, 261 
globosus All. Actuar, ad. Fl. “Pedem. 49 .(1789) (P. 
__capillaris Nees se ae yy nes ... BF. vii, 260 
unioloides R.Br, Prodr. 216 (1810) (P. angulatus Nees) B.FI. vii, 260 
Sub-genus ii, Juncellus, 
Style 2-cleft (rarely 3-cleft), Nut dorsally compressed, 1.¢., one flat or 
concave side next the rhachis. 
pygmeus Rottb. Deser. et Ic. 20 t. 14 (1773) (J. 
pygmexus C. B. Clarke)... ae red ... BF. vii, 262 
levigatus LL. Mantiss. 179 (1771). Proc. Linn. Soc. 
_ NS.W. xxvii, 64 (1902) (J. levigatus C. B. 
Clarke) ie Apr ML: Ri pis wee, TRI ath BIB} 
*In_ the systematic arrangement of this Family we follow C. B. Clarke, who was the 
recognised authority on the subject until his death in 1906, but we do not strictly follow 
-his nomenclature ; for example, we keep the genus Cyperus as understood by Bentham 
-and Mueller, not splitting it into four genera as C. B. Clarke does, and in the genus 
Carex we follow G. Kiikenthal’s recently published:monograph in the Pflanzenreich, 
. 
. 
