16. 
17. 
A8. 
3B). 
100 
Gompholobium Sm. in Trans. Linn, Soe. iv, 220 (1798). 
latifolium Sm. in Koen. & Sims, Ann. of Bot. i, 505 
(1805), Bot. Mag. t. 4171 ... rat _ ie 
Huegelii Benth. in Hueg. Enum. 29 (1837)* (G. pedun- 
culare Lodd.) Lodd. Bot. Cab. t. 4171, Labill. 
Nov. Holl. Pl. i, t.133 ie 
var. leptophyllum Benth, Fl. ii, 43. 
grandiflorum Sm. Exot. Bot. t. 5 (1804) 
var, setifolium DC, B.FI. ii, 45. 
virgatum Sieb. in DC. Prodr. ii, 105 (1824) 
var, aspalathoides Benth. Fl. ii, 45. 
minus Sm. in Trans. Linn. Soc. ix, 251 (1808) 
var. grandiflora Benth. Fl. ii, 45. 
uncinatum A. Cunn, in Ann, Wien. Mus. ii, 72 (1838) 
glabratum DC. Prodr, ii, 106 (1824), Maiden, Illustr. 
N.S.W. Pl. ii, t. 14... ee 
pinnatum Sm, in Trans. Linn. Soe. ix, 251 (1808) 
eee ese 
. 
BFL 
B.FI. 
B.FI. 
B.FI. 
BFL. 
B.FI. 
BFL 
B.FI. 
Jacksonia R.Br. in Ait. Hort. Kew. sec, ed. iii, 12 (1811). 
rhadinoclona F.v.M. Fragm. x, 37 (1876). 
Clarkei F.v.M. in Proc. Linn, Soc. N.S.W. ii (see. ser.), 
192 (1887). 
scoparia R.Br. in Ait. Hort. Kew (sec. ed.), iii, 13 
(1811) ic re fe 0 ont 
var. parviflora Benth. Fl. ii, 59. 
var. gonoclada Maiden «& Betche, Proc. Linn. Soe. 
N.S.W. xxxv, 791 (1910). 
Stackhousii F.v.M. in Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. vi, 791 
(1882). 
. ° 
Spherolobium Sm. in Keenig & Sims, Ann. of Bot. 
i, 509 (1805). 
vimineum Sm. l.c., Bot. Mag. t. 969, Lodd. Bot. Cab. 
t. 1753, Labill. Nov. Holl. Pl. i, t. 138 
Viminaria Sm. Exot. Bot. 51 (1804). 
denudata Sm. l.c,, Bot. Mag. t. 1190, Ic. Sel. 
Thenen. i, t,32 ... <a My Tt Br 
. Daviesia Sm. in Trans. Linn, Soc. iv, 222 (1798). 
Section ii, Umballate. 
concinna R.Br. in B.FI. ii, 75 (1864) .... et 
Section iii, Racemosex. 
umbellulata Sm. in Koen. & Sims, Ann. of Bot. i, 507 
(1805) Tod tres J: 
var. pubigera Benth. Fl. ii, 75. 
BHI. 
BF. 
BF. 
BF. 
B.FL. 
i, 42 
uu, 43 
li, 44 
li, 45 
li, 45 
li, 46 
i, 48 
li, 48 
thy 4538) 
li, 65 
li, 68 
iy, (AH) 
rhe, ffs 
* F. v. Mueller adopted the name G. pedunculare Lodd. because Loddiges’ name was 
‘published in 1830, seven years before Bentham’s name; but Loddiges’ paragraph—‘‘A 
amall delicate plant, growing less thana foot high, producing its large and elegant 
flowers of most brilliant golden yellow in July ’—cannot be called a botanical descrip- 
tion, and is justly passed over in favour of Bentham’s name, bi 
