122 
11. Mallotus Lour. Fl. Cochinch. ii, 635 (1790). 
claoxyloides J. Muell. in Linnxa xxxiv, 192 (1865) 
Illustr. Cook’s Voy. iii, t. 292 : ae :.. BF. yi, 140 
philippinensis J. Muell. l.c., Tllustr. Cook’s Voy, iii, t. 
20 Sees ex ase Be nee ods Eo WL Fat, abl 
discolor F.v,M. in B.Fl. vi, 143 (1873) a «. BHI. yi, 143 
12. Alchorned Sol. in Swartz Prodr. 698 (1788). 
ilicifolia J. Muell. in Linnea xxxiv, 170 (1865) Pee Osh evismelS6 
13. Macaranga Thou. Gen. Madag. n. 88 (1809). 
tanaria J. Muell. in DC. Prodr. xv, 997 (1866) Se Biklievi, 146 
14. Acalypha L. Hort. Cliff. 495 (1737), 
nemorum F.v.M. in Linnea xxxiv, 38 (1865)* ... pao URL Sat, BY 
capillipes F.v.M. in Linnea xxxiv, 40 (1865) ... as dente ay BH 
15. Tragia Plum. Gen. 14 (1703), 
nove hollandiz J. Muell. in Linnea xxxiv, 180 (1865) B.FI. vi, 138 
Sub-tribe iii, Manthotes. 
16. Adriana Gaud. in Ann. Sc. Nat. v, 223 (1895). 
glabrata Gaud. lc. (A. acerifolia J. Muell., A. acerifolia 
Hook, var. glabrata Benth., A. tomentosa F.v.M, 
non Gaud.) ... is ne Sa aie gin 
var, ‘acerifolia (Hook.) Pax ia ‘Das Pflanzenreich,” 
Euphorbiacex-Adrianew, p. 18 (1910) (A. acerifolia - 
Hook. ) cr ae od ect of ney JERIPIL ag, ISH 
BEL. vi, 134 
Sub-tribe iv, Cluyties. 
17. Baloghia Endl. Prodr, Fl. Norf, 84 (1833). We 
lucida.Endl. lc. Figd. in Maiden, Forest Flora N.S.W., 
Part vii (1904) B.FI. vi, 148 
Sub-tribe y, Hippomaness. 
18. Excecaria 1. Syst. Veg. ed. x, 1288 (1759) (Excecaria), 
agallocha L. Spec. Plant. ed. ii, 1451 ( 1763) var. ovalis 
(Endl.) J. Muell. Figd. in Bailey & Gord. Stock 
Poison. Pl. p. 89 ... ed oe ss os 
Dallachiana (Baill.) Benth. Fl. vi, 153 (1873) (E. agal- 
locha L. var. Dallachiana Baill.), Proc, Linn. Soc. 
N.S.W. xxiv, 443 (1899). Figd. in Bailey & 
Gord. Stock Poison. Pl. p.91 1... oe wits 
B.Fl. vi, 152 
B.Fl. vi, 153 
* We have New South Wales Specimens of a nearly glabrous form with large thin 
leaves on long petioles in the Herbarium, which look very distinct from the typical 
soft-hairy form of A. nemorum. These evidently are the specimens referred to by 
Bentham in the footnote at p. 132 of vol. vi, Fl. Austr. : ‘The species is exceedingly 
variable in the indumentum, sometimes very dense and soft, sometimes scarcely any, in 
the breadth of the leaves and length of the petiole, &c.” ; 
To us the form seems to deserve to be raised into a distinct variety (perhaps var. 
glabrescens), but Bentham, who probably had more complete material at his isposal 
than we haye, seems to haye thought differently. 
