180 
euphrasioides Benth. in Mitch, Trop. Austr. 360 (1848) B.Fl, y, 104 
staurophylla F.v.M. Fragm. ix, 73 (1875). 
CMa ek Cunn, in Benth, Lab. Gen. et a 
453 (1836) . fas B.FI. v, 105 
_ Section ii, Klanderia. 
ringens Benth. in Mitch. Trop. Austr. 363 (1848) ... BWI. v, 106 
Leichhardtii Benth. ; Proc. Linn. Soe. ee XXXV, 
794 (1910) . . = soy VEIL sty KOT 
Walteri F.v. M. Frage, Vii, ;, 108 (1870), 
coccitiea, F.v.M. in ‘Trans. Phil. Soc. Vict. 1, 48 (1854) 
(P. microphylla A. Cunn.) .. B.El. v, 106 
var. aspalathoides F.v.M. ‘yal aoa i. Ganeas (P, 
aspalathoides A. Cunn).  ... ra 6 ay LEMANS 
chlorantha F.v.M. in B FL v, 108 (1870) a cos ABEL yj) CO 
9. Hemigenia R.Br. Prod. 502 (1810). 
purpurea R.Br, Lc. nes 330 Ae co RIL 
cuneifolia Benth. Fl. vy, 118 (1870)* v8 Gn pre ts) L)) Seny eels 
10. Wesiin ele Sm. in Kongl. Sv. Vet. Ak. Handl. 171 
(1797). 
rosmariniformis Sm. Le. . ee att: rays meats VeRATUL stg, ARS 
rigida R.Br. Prodr. 501 (1810) _ ES M98 Sa, WREIL, =Ag, TAY) 
longifolia R.Br. 1c. :  NSEIRIE yg 1leshil 
eremicola A, Cunn. in Benth. Lab, Gen. ob Sp. 459, 
Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict. xxvi, 10 (1913)... vy APHIS) LG 
var. quaterna Benth. FI. y, 130. 
Cheelii Maiden & Betche, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. W. 
xxxv, 792 (1910). 
glabra R.Br. Prodr. 501 (1810) (See Hemigenia 
cuneifolia) ... 4 sok: ts: om cory ABIL, yy MIL 
Tribe vi, Ajugoides. 
11. Teucrium 1. after Tournef. Inst. 207 (1700), 
racemosum R.Br. Prodr. 504 (1810)... at: wa HME xy, 
corymbosum R.Br.le. ... “as ISH ve GR 
sessiliflorum Benth. in DC. Brees xi, 580 (1848) nee ABRIDIL Tg GH! 
argutum R.Br. Prodr. 594 (1810) 206 Ais coq FELINE, sg, lets) 
var. incisum Benth. FI. v, 135. 
12. Ajuga L. Gen. Plant. 167 (1737) 
australis R.Br. Prodr. 503 (1810), ... DSH eveneloo 
sinuata R.Br. Prodr. 503 (1810) (A. austenlia var. 
sinuata F.v.M. impl. from i. Census)+ firs con ARAM Sy GY 
* As regards the George’s River locality quoted by Bentham, Mr. J. 1. Boorn.an 
collector, Botanic Gav dens, Sydney, has re-discovered it and Prof. Ewart writes :— 
“Your specimen from George’s River is identical with Dr. Woolls’ specimen classed 
as Westringia glabra and from the same locality (but labelled as Hemigenia cuneate in 
Mueller’s handwriting). We have also a specimen under W. glabra which i is very close, 
if not identical with it, and which was originally named W. vtolacea Muell ” 
Where suitable material is av ailable, examination should be made to see if Hemigenia 
cuneifolia Benth. can stand a penn enyly of Westringia glabra R.Br. 
+ Bentham expresses in his Flora y, 137 a decided opinion wee Ajuga sinuata R.Br. 
isa good Species, and should not be united with A. australis. uet seems to support 
Bentham’s view in the Nat. Pfi.-Fam., at least he mentions ae species without 
comment. 
