| In the 621st article in the last fasciculus (Ieoma@A Jalapa 8. rosea) we 
omitted to add a further distinction between that supposed variety and 
| « macrorhiza of the 342d article of the 4th volume of this Register; viz. 
| that the tube is proportionably much shorter in @. than in «. Upon the 
i} whole we agree with Mr. Don in the opinion of the two being specifi- 
i} cally different. 
| 
i] 
| 
| 
i} 
1 
/ | = * 
1} 
i 
i| 
it 
i 
| 
} \ 
I} 
) 
1 4 
ie ee 
