846 
COREOPSIS tinctoria. 
_ Dyeing Coreopsis. 
SYNGENESIA POLYGAMIA FRUSTANEA. 
Nat. ord. Composirs, Juss. H&t1aANTHEm-CorzopsipEm, Cassini. _ 
COREOPSIS. Supra vol.1. fol. 7. 
C. tinctoria, foliis radicalibus pinnatis v. bipinnatis integerrimis ; superiori- 
bus linearibus 3-partitis, involucri foliolis exterioribus abbreviatis, radio 
basi discolore. rier etait 2 a ae “ 
C. tinctoria, ‘* Nuttall journ. acad. nut. sc. phil. 1821: p. 114,” fide Barton 
flora of N. Amer. 2. t. 45. Radius beschreibung neuer pflanzen. t. 4. 
Botan. zeitung. beil. 1824. p. 85. Bot. mag. 2512. Sweet’s Flower, Gar- 
den. t.'72. ; pana 3 é 
Herba biennis? culta bipedalis. Caules ramosi, striati, angulosi, teretes, 
glaberrimi. Folia radicalia pinnata, pinnis alternis, obovatis, glabris, inte- 
gerrimis, quandoque 3-partitis, ultima majore; petiolo plano, sub alato, 
pustulato; superiora subopposita, 3-5-partita, linearia, obtusa, lobo medio 
duplo longiore. Capituli solitarit, longe pedunculati.. Involucrum foliolis 
exterioribus minutis ovatis, acutis, interioribus multo. majoribus rotundato- 
ovatis. Flosculi radi cuneatt, 3-fidi, aurantiact, bast discolores, disci atro- 
brunnet equales. 
This fine plant was first discovered by Mr. Nuttall, in 
the Arkansa country, where it is very abundant as far as the 
Red River ; chiefly growing in prairies. subject to occasional 
inundations, and flowering from June to October. In its 
native state, it is said to vary exceedingly in stature, being 
Sometimes not a foot high, while in other situations it at- 
tains the height of five feet. % 
Our drawing was made at Mr. Lee’s Nursery, in last 
July. The species is now, however, to be found in many 
collections, having been introduced to this country at 
nearly the same time both from North America and Ger- 
many, where it was first published in Europe, by our friend 
Dr. Radius, in his Beschreibung neuer Pflanzen. 
We can find no where an explanation of the specific 
name of this plant. 3 
: The following is the character attributed by M. Cassini, 
in his latest publication, to this genus, which he observes is 
badly defined, and scarcely different from Dahlia. 
