“s ¢ the Fishery Board for SccHae ; 260 
ads that were fee in 7 to 8 fathoms west of Tan Bouy, Cumbrae,’ ad he 
adds, ‘ This was the only time I met with it.’* 
% In ‘British Sessile- eyed Crustacea,’ vol. i. p. 67, it is stated in the 
_ generic description of Danaia that the mandibles are ‘destitute of a palpi- 
‘ form appendage.’ Thatis not so. They possess an elongate three-jointed 
palp (fig. ) which has somehow been overlooked by the author when pre- 
paring the description of the genus. The Rev. T. R. R. Stebbing in his valu- 
able work on the Challenger Amphipoda, referring tothisgenus in a foot-note 
at p. 1671 (vol. xxix. of the Challenger Reports), points out that ‘in 1849 
* Milne Edwards and J. Haime, (““‘Comptes Rendus,” t. xxix. p. 261), gave 
‘the name Dania to a genus of fossil Corals; this name they spell 
* Danaia in the general index to their Monograph of the British Fossil 
* Corals, Paleont. Soc. vol. for 1854, published 1865. Danaia, Spence 
* Bate, must therefore give way to the later Cressa, Boeck, with which a 
* specimen of the type species recently obtained and dissected proves it to 
‘ be certainly synonymous.’ See also a foot-note at p. 747 of Mr Stebbing’s 
work referred to above. 
Halimedon parvimanus (Bate and Westwood). 
1862. Westwoodilla cecula, Bate, ‘ Cat. Amphip. Brit. Mus.,’ p. 
102. 
1862. Westwoodilla hyalina, idem, ibedem, p. 103. 
Tees: Cidiceros parvimanus, Sp. Bate and Westwood, ‘ Brit. Sess.- 
“eyed Crust.,’ vol. i. p. 161. 
1870. Halimedon Millert, A. Boeck, ‘ Crust. Amphip. bor. et 
“Arct.,’ p. 89. 
1889. Pblimedon purvimanus, Norman, ‘Ann. and Mag.,’ S. 6, 
vol, ili, p. 455, pl. xx. figs. 10-14. 
Habitat.—From trawl refuse from Station V., Firth of Forth, February 
1892, and on one or two previous occasions from other parts of the Forth. 
This species seems to be rare in the Forth, as only one specimen at a time 
has been obtained. The Forth specimens agree very closely with the 
figures and description in the ‘British Sessile-eyed Crustacea,’ in having 
the Gnathopods distinctly subchelate, the rostrum strongly produced, the 
eye large and near the apex of the rostrum. 
Pontocrates haplocheles (Grube). 
1864. Kron yeria haplocheles, Grube, “Die Insel Lussin und ihre 
*Meeresfauna. Nach einen sech wichentlichen aufenthalte ges- 
‘childert, von Dr Adolph Eduard Grube.’ Breslau, 1864. — 
1868. Kroyera brevicarpa, Bate and Westwood, ‘ Brit. Sess.-eyed 
*Crust.,’ vol. ii. p. 508. 
1870. Pontocrates haplocheles, Boeck, ‘Crust. Amphip. bor. et Arct.’ 
Habitat.—Largo Bay, dredged 1889. One specimen only of this appar- 
ently rare amphipod was obtained. In this speciés the first Gnathopods 
are short and comparatively broad, and the produced part of the carpus 
- terminates in a distinct finger-like process. The propodos of the second 
| Gnathopods are long and slender ; the lower angle of the carpus is very 
____ little produced, which thus differs from other British species of Pontocrates 
% that have the lower angle of the carpus of the second Gnathopods produced 
as far as, or beyond, the extremity of the propodos. In Pontocrates hap- 
_ bocheles the lower produced part of the propodos, which forms the palm of 
the chela, consists of two distinct portions, the outer or lower is much 
more slender than the other, and terminates in a slightly curved point a 
. Iittle beyond the end of the chela. This structure, which seems to be 
e Ba ipods and Isopoda of the Clyde, p. 15 ae? 
