522  American  Pharmaceutical  Association.    {'^°'  oct!yiS.^'"°'" 
11.  The  manufacture  of  secret  mixtures  for  popular  self-medication. 
12.  The  selling  of  secret  preparations  by  apothecaries. 
13.  The  manufacture  of  secret  preparations  in  bulk  for  others- 
14.  The  exclusive  use  of  a  trade-marked  name  invented  for  a  simple  mixture. 
1-5.  The  protection  by  trade-mark  or  copyright  for  prints,  labels,  etc. 
16.  The  copyrighting  of  b^oks  written  exclusively  for  pharmacists  and 
physicians. 
17.  The  dispen-ing  of  preparations  protected  by  copyright,  patent  or  trade- 
mark.   [See  Xo.  10]. 
15.  The  manufacture  of  pharmaceutical  preparations,  for  which  the  ingredi- 
ents are  given,  but  the  working  process  is  withheld. 
19.  Property  in  advantageous  methods  for  preparing  valuable  constituents 
from  crude  drags. 
20.  The  use  by  the  pharma':;opoeia  of  the  results  of  individual  research. 
21.  Is  it  proper  to  label  a  substance  as  though  manufactured  by  us  when  in 
reality  it  is  only  selected  or  perhaps  pm'ified  ? 
22.  The  introduction  into  the  pharmacopoeia  of  liquid  preparations  repre- 
senting in  two  minims  one  grain  of  the  drug. 
23.  The  election,  besides  a  president,  of  a  presiding  chairman  with  parlia- 
mentary experience  and  knowledge. 
24.  Rigid  examinations  by  state  boards  and  education  of  assistants  at  colleges 
of  pharmacy. 
25.  Salaries  to  the  secretaries  of  sections. 
The  President's  address  was  referred  to  a  committee  consisting  of  John 
Weyer  of  Cincinnati :  J.  L.  Lemberger  of  Lebanon.  Pa.,  and  Geo.  W.  Sloan  of 
Indianapolis.  The  report  on  credentials  being  presented  showed  that  delegates 
ha'l  been  appointed  by  the  Colleges  of  Pharmacy  of  California,  Chicago,  Cin- 
cinnati, Louisville,  Maryland,  Massachusetts,  Xew  York,  Ontario,  Philadelphia, 
Pittsbm-g,  St.  Louis  and  Washington  f  National) :  by  the  State  Pharmaceutical 
Associations  of  Alabama,  Arkansas,  Connecticut,  Dakota,  (Xorth  and  South,) 
Delaware,  Georgia,  Illinois,  Indiana,  Iowa,  Kansas,  Kentucky,  Louisiana,  Massa- 
chusetts, Michigan,  Minnesota,  Missouri,  Xebr  iska,  Xew  Hampshire,  Xew  Jer- 
sey, Xew  York,  North  Carolina,  Ohio,  Pennsylvania,  Rhode  Island,  Tennessee, 
Virginia,Wisconsin  and  of  the  Province  of  Quebec  ;  by  the  Alumni  Associations 
of  the  Chicago.  Cincinnati.  Louisville,  Philadelphia  and  St.  Louis  Colleges  of 
Pharmacy:  and  by  the  local  associations  of  Cleveland,  Connecticut  River, 
X.  H..  Dauphin  Co.,  Pa.,  Detroit,  and  Kings  Co..  Y.,  and  the  St.  Louis 
Club  of  Microscopists.  When  the  dominating  Committee  was  subsequently 
appointed,  it  was  found  that  from  ten  of  the  states  mentioned  no  delegates 
were  present,  or  they  had  not  arrived.  The  delegations  of  each  state  named 
two  members  to  serve  on  the  dominating  Committee,  and  the  President  ap- 
pointed fi'om  the  Association  at  large  the  following  members  not  dele- 
gates :  A.  E.  Ebert,  William  Dupont,  E.  Bocking,  John  Ingalls  and  J.  F. 
Judge. 
The  Secretary  of  Council  read  the  names  of  126  persons  proposed  for  mem- 
bership all  of  whom  were  invited  to  join ;  the  total  number  of  new  members  pro- 
posed and  elected  at  the  meeting  was  215.  Afterward  the  minutes  of  Council 
since  the  last  meeting  of  the  association  were  read.  These  minutes  referred  to 
the  incorporation  of  the  Association  under  the  laws  of  Congress,  the  publica- 
