ie 
of the Fishery Board for Scotland. 24:7 
tooth-like projections. A strong spine with ciliated edges extends down- 
wards from the interior distal angle of the second basal joint of the first 
pair. The second, third, and fourth pairs are very similar to the same 
appendages in Canuella, in each pair the length of the inner and outer 
branches is subequal and both are slender and elongated (fig. 9). The fifth 
pair are somewhat like those of Longipedia, in each foot the basal joint is 
almost rudimentary, and consists of a narrow plate which extends laterally 
outwards into a small cylindrical lobe, bearing at its apex an elongated 
and slender plumose seta; the secondary branch is elongate-narrow and 
sub-cylindrical, about four times longer than broad, and furnished with 
one long and plumose terminal seta and a sub-terminal and shorter one ; 
a small seta also springs from near the middle of the outer margin. 
Interiorly the basal joint is not produced, nor does it appear to carry 
either spines or sete (fig. 10). 
Habitat.—Found in the stomach of a small Haddock captured about 
sixty-five miles south-eastward of Sumburgh Head, Shetland, September 
4th, 1900. Obtained also in some bottom material collected with a tow-net 
about fifty miles south-eastward of the Fair Island, between Orkney and 
Shetland, October 19th, 1900. The tow-net had touched the bottom, and 
when hauled up was found to contain a quantity of sand, amongst which 
were several rare Crustaceans. The vessel on which these collections were 
made was the steam trawler ‘‘ St. Andrew,” of Aberdeen. 
Remarks.—The species described above, while agreeing in some respects 
both with Longinedia, Claus, and Canuella,T. and A. Scott, presents too 
many points of difference to permit of its being ascribed to either of these 
two genera. I have already drawn attention to the fact that the secondary 
branches of the antennee in Hucanwella are only four-jointed, whereas in 
Canuella and Longipedia the secondary branches are composed of six 
joints; and it has also been shown that the second maxillipedes in 
Hucanuella are more fully developed than they are in either of these two 
genera. It has also to be noted that whereas in Lucanuella in the 
branches of the second pair of thoracic feet the inner and outer branches 
are about equal in length, the inner branches of the same pair in 
Longipedia are remarkably elongated; aud, further, in Hucanuella 
the fifth pair of feet have the secondary joint moderately developed 
and somewhat similar in form and armature to the fifth pair in Longipedia, 
but in Canuella the fitth pair are quite rudimentary. There are other 
points of difference, but these are quite sufficient to distinguish 
Hucanuella from either Canuella or Longipedia, to which it is no doubt 
closely allied. 
Bradya typica, Boeck. 
This species was obtained in material dredged in the Moray Firth, and 
examined during last year. 
Bradya hirsuta, T, and A. Scott. 
One or two specimens of this distinct species were obtained in the 
same gathering as the last ; it is a moderately large species with strougly 
divergent caudal furca. : 
Bradya elegans, T. and A. Scott. 
This species has not only been observed in the Moray Firth along with 
the others just referred to, but it has also been obtained in material 
dredged by the ‘‘ Garland” in Loch Eil, at the head of Loch Linuhe, in 
10 to 15 fathoms, on the 38rd of April last year, 
R 
